Whereas yours make you sound a bit of a inverterted snob but that's based on 2 posts and I couldn't say if you're like that IRL.
The poster just expressed an opinion formed in a series of encounters the same as everyone else yet you seem to have taken offence that it wasn't negative. Most people, I think, acknowledge the problematic nature of Britain's classist society, the poster wasn't commenting on the existence of the aristocracy as a whole.
There are ways to express your opinions without attacking the individual
Calm down, dear.
This is the second time on the same thread. The first time I asked a question about somebody who had worked for the Bin Laden family and a sanctimonious posted leapt in to tell me I was anti-Islamic.
This time, I ask a question about how a poster could possibly know that Prince Charles is ‘bright with the memory of an elephant’ and that Earl Spencer is ‘not snobby and is paying it all back’ unless she knew them both very well. This, it appears, renders me ‘an inverted snob’.
No, dear. It renders me somebody who likes to see the evidence for statements.
Be reassured: I have taken no offence. I asked to see the poster’s evidence base for making those assertions. I noted that non-snobby people generally do not request that people address them as ‘my Lord’ and ‘sir’.
It may surprise you to learn that some people form a breathless, rose-tinted opinion of royal or aristocratic people based on...er...not very much evidence, eg having shaken hands with one of them at a garden party and having been asked whether they have come far. Fancy that, eh?