Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Biden's not a dog's dinner: Champ, Major (and Snowflake) know a President when they sniff one (Trump thread #126)

980 replies

TheNorthWestPawsage · 22/02/2021 09:02

Thread title inspired by minou123 Smile

Previous thread:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/4162151-Whilst-Biden-and-Harris-are-busy-doing-their-jobs-theres-an-Impeachment-Hearing-going-on-125?msgid=104924217#104924217

OP posts:
Thread gallery
25
AcrossthePond55 · 18/03/2021 12:44

@DGRossetti

His fleet of planes and golf courses have also seen drops in their value.

I bet he doesn't "own" them in any manner ordinary people would recognise.

He has a history of 'selling' his name to other people. I'm pretty sure most of the property bearing his name is his (but mortgaged to the hilt), but anything else like consumer goods is actually a licensing deal.

Trump steaks, Trump ties, etc. All licensing deals. And all (to the best of my knowledge) defunct.

EveryoneRevealsThemselves · 18/03/2021 13:06

Article in Washington Post (can’t read though as behind pay wall):

“NEW: Trump has fallen from a moment of legal invincibility to a moment of vulnerability unlike any in his life. He is facing 6 investigations and 29 lawsuits (and counting)”

EveryoneRevealsThemselves · 18/03/2021 13:18

Trump steaks, Trump ties, etc. All licensing deals. And all (to the best of my knowledge) defunct

And so many so hypocritical. If you ever wanted to see what type of man Trump was, you only have to know that he lent his name and backing to “Trump vodka” despite famously being tee total due to his brother’s death from alcoholism.

DGRossetti · 18/03/2021 13:22

He has a history of 'selling' his name to other people. I'm pretty sure most of the property bearing his name is his (but mortgaged to the hilt), but anything else like consumer goods is actually a licensing deal.

See also: Richard Branson. Whose Byzantine business dealings are occasionally fodder for Private Eye ....

DGRossetti · 18/03/2021 13:23

@EveryoneRevealsThemselves

Trump steaks, Trump ties, etc. All licensing deals. And all (to the best of my knowledge) defunct

And so many so hypocritical. If you ever wanted to see what type of man Trump was, you only have to know that he lent his name and backing to “Trump vodka” despite famously being tee total due to his brother’s death from alcoholism.

Why is that hypocritical ? Seems a paradigm of capitalism to me.
AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 18/03/2021 14:19

[quote lionheart]www.thedailybeast.com/georgia-sheriff-spokesman-jay-baker-posted-racist-covid-shirts-on-facebook[/quote]
Those shirts: the American forces put the Stars-and-Stripes on the right sleeve of their operation t-shirts, British forces put the Union Flag on the left sleeve. There's a "this is what the military approve/wear" vibe going on there as well as the racism.

DuncinToffee · 18/03/2021 16:49

Qanon again

Alex Kaplan @AlKapDC
A false conspiracy theory has spread widely in the far-right internet (not just within the QAnon community) that some incident involving a microphone and Biden talking to reporters shows he and the incident were somehow faked
Since Biden was inaugurated, QAnon supporters have pushed false claims of supposed proof that Biden hasn't really been president & his activities as president haven't been real. This may be the first time those claims have in some manner really spread elsewhere in the far-right.
twitter.com/AlKapDC/status/1372207813355839503?s=19

Fact checked
leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2021/03/fact-check-joe-biden-did-not-have-a-green-screen-fail-and-was-seen-live-at-the-white-house-speaking-to-reporters.html

TheNorthWestPawsage · 18/03/2021 19:20

Trump set to do at least 12 book interviews in the coming weeks
“Donald doesn’t believe in the concept of ‘no comment.’”
www.politico.com/news/2021/03/17/donald-trump-book-interviews-476864

The sheer number of book interviews is so massive that some in his orbit worry he may be doing too many and hurting his ability to monetize his own recollections for a book of his own, should he choose to write one.

OP posts:
AcrossthePond55 · 19/03/2021 00:16

@TheNorthWestPawsage

Trump set to do at least 12 book interviews in the coming weeks “Donald doesn’t believe in the concept of ‘no comment.’” www.politico.com/news/2021/03/17/donald-trump-book-interviews-476864

The sheer number of book interviews is so massive that some in his orbit worry he may be doing too many and hurting his ability to monetize his own recollections for a book of his own, should he choose to write one.

Gee, Bob Woodward's not on the list? I can't image why. Grin

Doofus just can't keep his mouth shut, can he? Any chance to hear himself bloviate and try to shape his own narrative is simply irresistible to him.

AcrossthePond55 · 19/03/2021 00:19

that should be 'imagine'. Not 'image'.

lionheart · 19/03/2021 00:47

nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/03/are-the-atlanta-spa-shootings-a-hate-crime.html

'Are the Atlanta Killings a Hate Crime? The Suspect Doesn’t Get to Decide.'

DGRossetti · 19/03/2021 10:35

The sheer number of book interviews is so massive that some in his orbit worry he may be doing too many and hurting his ability to monetize his own recollections for a book of his own, should he choose to write one.

Interesting - and I have no doubt precise - use of pronouns there; once you degarble it.

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 19/03/2021 11:37

I do not believe 45 ever wrote a book in his life, any more than he has ever read one.

The problem may be finding anyone now prepared to do the writing for him and have the wrong name put on the cover of the work. If anyone does agree he (it won't be a she, that wouldn't be acceptable to 45) likely to want payment up front before the first interview for it, with monthly payment in advance to keep him working on it.

lionheart · 19/03/2021 11:46

And a non-disclosure agreement so their actual identity is never revealed. Smile

DGRossetti · 19/03/2021 11:54

Maybe write it by AI ? Feed the past 4 years into "Watson" and see what comes out ?

lionheart · 19/03/2021 12:57

It would make more sense.

AcrossthePond55 · 19/03/2021 13:52

@DGRossetti

Maybe write it by AI ? Feed the past 4 years into "Watson" and see what comes out ?
I think Watson would meltdown and explode. Even 'it' couldn't begin to compute the insanity of the last 4 years. The 'illogic' would be more than even Watson could handle.
DGRossetti · 19/03/2021 14:05

Meet the new boss ...

Same as the old boss !

www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/white-house-cannabis-use-resign-b1819614.html

White House asks several staffers to resign over past cannabis use, report says

Several White House employees have reportedly been asked to resign for admitting to past cannabis use, regardless of whether the staff members had been located in states where it was legal at the time.

So far, 14 states and the District of Columbia have legalised marijuana for adult recreational use, and 36 states permit medical use of the drug. It is still illegal at a federal level however, which acts as a barrier to obtain a security clearance if past use is admitted.

While hiring staffers earlier this year, the Biden administration asked employees to disclose past cannabis use as part of a lengthy background check, but told some of them that they would “overlook” their answer, according to The Daily Beast.

This came after the White House updated its guidelines last month to allow for “limited” use of cannabis in the past, explaining that it did not want it to be a barrier to good candidates working for the administration.

However, White House director of Management and Administration Anne Filipic reportedly called several staffers this week to inform them that because they admitted to past cannabis use, they would have to resign or be placed in a remote work programme.

One former staffer who was asked to resign expressed surprise at the move, telling The Daily Beast that “the policies were never explained, the threshold for what was excusable and what was inexcusable was never explained.”

Another staffer claimed that “it’s exclusively targeting younger staff and staff who came from states where it was legal.”

Under new guidelines introduced by the Biden administration, White House staffers have been asked to cease all cannabis use and are subject to random drug tests.

Last month, prominent Democratic senators Chuck Schumer, Cory Booker and Ron Wyden released a joint statement declaring their intention to push forward major cannabis policy reform during the Biden administration.

“The War on Drugs has been a war on people — particularly people of colour,” the statement reads.

“Ending the federal marijuana prohibition is necessary to right the wrongs of this failed war and end decades of harm inflicted on communities of colour across the country.”

The Democratic senators also stipulated that as “states continue to legalise marijuana” they will also work to “lift up people who were unfairly targeted in the War on Drugs.”

“We are committed to working together to put forward and advance comprehensive cannabis reform legislation that will not only turn the page on this sad chapter in American history, but also undo the devastating consequences of these discriminatory policies.”

The Independent has contacted the White House for comment.

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 19/03/2021 14:14

Hmmm.

“the policies were never explained, the threshold for what was excusable and what was inexcusable was never explained.”

This leads me to feel that the same staffer might have added "and if I had known, obviously I would have lied about it."

DGRossetti · 19/03/2021 14:18

@AskingQuestionsAllTheTime

Hmmm.

“the policies were never explained, the threshold for what was excusable and what was inexcusable was never explained.”

This leads me to feel that the same staffer might have added "and if I had known, obviously I would have lied about it."

Smile

Given we are in the middle of CensusUK 2021, then the topic of what you disclose to who and why is hot news.

Personally I noted the observation that the drugs thing is very much a Nixon-esque policy to be racist without using the words that offend. (This isn't conjecture. Nixon admitted it). So for the Biden administration to be acting this way does rather blow chunks out of any guff they have spouted about reversing the damage of right wing dogma.

Not that the legion of cynics will be surprised. As the quote from my PP shows, not everyone believes the hype.

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 19/03/2021 14:23

I'd say that it was probably being done so there could not be the accusation made that of course they want to legalise cannabis use, they are a bunch of pot-heads at the White House.

DGRossetti · 19/03/2021 14:26

@AskingQuestionsAllTheTime

I'd say that it was probably being done so there could not be the accusation made that of course they want to legalise cannabis use, they are a bunch of pot-heads at the White House.
Which has nothing to do with individual states approaches.

Fascinating question about "the Union" that's never been solved, really. What happens when federal government fundamentally opposes something that a state has 100% competence in legislating for ???

In some cases it could be so basic it causes a civil war between states and federeration. Let's hope that never happens.