@Zizzagaaaaahttss
How do you all feel about the 2.1 million election votes that are going to be forensically audited in maricopa county?
If there's a reason to do it, that meets some threshold to avoid vexatious demands for recounts then it should be done. But I suspect, as a PP said, it will just repeat the current result and thus be a waste of time and money.
Also at this stage it will make no difference to who the current incumbent is. Just as investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election made no difference to Trump being president.
It was proven that the Russians had indeed interfered, but not whether their interference had changed the outcome of the election.
But even if the Russian interference HAD been proven to have changed the outcome, by the time the investigation was finished Trump had been sworn in.
There isn't really a mechanism for dealing with this situation. (And only a president with integrity, who put the national interest and the preservation of democracy above their personal power, would resign the presidency if they realised they'd been installed by a hostile power.)