It wasn’t Upstairs Downstairs or Downton Abbey, but then Downton Abbey wasn’t historically accurate either (if you want that, watch the excellent Gosford Park). Despite being a history geek, particularly for the Georgian era, I loved Bridgerton. Frothy, silly and Jane Austen meets Gossip Girl. Marvellous! I could even forgive the Duke his anachronistic lack of a hat 
The recent film of David Copperfield had a mix of races and made no logical sense
See, I thought Bridgerton was brilliantly cast because the family lines made sense. In David Copperfield you had a black actor playing the child of two white people and it just didn’t work IMO - it distracted from the story because the family lines didn’t add up.
@AnneElliott What's more annoying for me is when they take an Austen book and add arc into it ( Billie Piper as Fanny I'm looking at you).
God yes, Bridgerton is one thing because it’s supposed to be a daft frippery. But messing about with novels like Austen’s ought to be a hanging offence. Billy Piper was all wrong as Fanny, and the other relatively recent adaptation of Mansfield Park was no better, with its slave porn, drug use and hints of lesbianism. Leave it alone!
@Annasgirl Where is the Dukes country house? It made Mr. Darcy’s estate look lacklustre
What house? I was distracted by all the library steps action 