Firstly, we don't have that kind of democracy. The Swiss do and they vote on everything. We don't. There are different political systems and swapping randomly between them is a shit way to run a country.
We do have that kind of democracy, sometimes. That’s what a referendum is. It’s perfectly legitimate.
Secondly, for major constitutional change you'd normally expect a super-majority (probably a two thirds majority). Basically because of what we've just seen. Massive, life-altering change which only about half of the population wants. The Brexit majority probably doesn't exist now. Super-majorities guard against this.
Based on what?
Thirdly, the referendum was a fucking opinion poll, not legally binding.
Not legally binding, but the vote was offered on the basis that the outcome would be followed. So it was followed.
Fourthly (sic) it was illegally conducted and had it been a legally binding plebiscite, it would have been thrown out.
Really? How so?
Fifthly, plebiscites require an engaged, well-informed, educated populace which understands...
They don’t require this. It’s better if they have it but no, they don’t require it.