Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

EU blackmailing the UK

999 replies

houseinthesnow · 11/12/2020 05:31

So it comes to pass. The EU have decided unless we agree to their unreasonable demands they will halt all travel, including air and road travel whilst still fishing in our waters apparently!

It is nothing short of piracy.

The true nature of the EU has been exposed for some time, hence our departure - but now no one can be any doubt just to the levels they will sink to.
The EU have no interest in trade relations, nor cooperation, they only seek control and power. The trading relations is and was always, window dressing to create a superstate - and it seems they are now not afraid to inflict as much damage as possible to stop a member leaving.
Even the most passionate remainer will now see how deeply disturbing this behaviour actually is.

One could argue it is an act of war in fact.

It should be treated as such.

I will happily eat beans to the end of my days than be blackmailed by the EU. We all knew it would get nasty at the end, but who they knew they were capable of this. I suppose we can't be that surprised given the past. The gloves are off now for sure - and that goes both ways we should remind them.

Hard hats on.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
GetOffYourHighHorse · 11/12/2020 12:18

'The EU aren't going to allow EFTA, but a little bit better because that would mean re-negotiating EFTA for all the other EFTA members'

Oh fgs in 4 years they could've had a similar arrangement but called it something else. So not EFTA.

Honestly it's like pulling teeth. I'd rather we'd stayed but we didn't. I can't see why free trade is such an unattainable thing. We will all lose out, EU just as much when there isn’t any kind of deal.

Cornettoninja · 11/12/2020 12:19

@RedToothBrush your frustration is palpable.

I can’t say anything reassuring but I can offer solidarity because I completely recognise the tone of your posts and sympathise.

MushMonster · 11/12/2020 12:20

GrinGrinGrinGrinGrin of course it is all the EU's fault! Who else's could it be?
GrinGrinGrinGrinGrin

user1471565182 · 11/12/2020 12:21

Its those who voted for this who are responsible. Ive already seen some people lying about having voted for it (people really think we're all as stupid as they are and wont remember these things) and I will never let them forget.

RedToothBrush · 11/12/2020 12:24

FOUR FUCKING YEARS OF RUNNING THREADS ON FUCKING NORWAY ETC.

Asking at this point why didn't we do Norway and why can't you have an adult conversation about it is just hilarous.

Its so October 2016 and the Tory Party Conference.

I think we may have moved past that point.

DGRossetti · 11/12/2020 12:24

Here's how it all worked. At every possible opportunity, the UK found something to object to, and so we began the descent of these possiblities.

It was never the EUs job to work out what the fuck the UK wanted. And even now, it's clear from the few genuine leavers on this thread let alone in the population that leavers haven't a clue what they really want, you can see how impossible that would have been.

We were there. We fell down ever single step, with every single leaver here cheering on, and then voting on in 2019.

You got what you want. So enjoy it. If you want to blame someone, you don't need to cross the channel (luckily). Just look to Boris and his toady cronies. They're the ones who bought us here. So you can praise them or pillory them. But they have been the sole architects of what is happening. You don't need to look abroad for blame. For once, the job of fucking the UK over wasn't stolen by any foreigner. (Although you might wonder what planet Boris is from).

I have plenty more pictures to explain, if the words aren't working.

EU blackmailing the UK
FastMovingLuxuryGoods · 11/12/2020 12:26

So, as the exact terms of the Norway thing as turned down why can't the EU allow something similar. Lets see, free trade without free movement

because that is COMPLETELY in opposition to the principles of the EU, the CU and the SM.

WHY should they change all of their rules to satisfy a country that's told them to go fuck themselves??

Jesus Christ. This is so painful.

GetOffYourHighHorse · 11/12/2020 12:27

'You can't even explain what trading relationship Norway has with the EU or why the UK rejected a similar system which WAS an option.'

@RedToothBrush you maybe need a break from mn you have taking this situation very badly Flowers.

I of course can't explain things. I'm asking questions! so what? Staying in the EU would have been simpler, but the majority voted leave so we have.

Still wondering why we can't have a free trade deal? anyone other than red who may well combust please answer without any snidey sneering.

GetOffYourHighHorse · 11/12/2020 12:28

'WHY should they change all of their rules to satisfy a country that's told them to go fuck themselves??'

Because it would be mutually beneficial Confused.

DGRossetti · 11/12/2020 12:30

I of course can't explain things. I'm asking questions! so what? Staying in the EU would have been simpler, but the majority voted leave so we have.

Shame we didn't get the second referendum JRM felt was "eminently sensible" on agreeing what sort of Brexit we wanted though. That hit the bin pretty quickly.

The refusal of people championing Leave to admit they were lied to is suspicious. It's certainly a proxy for some sort of quailty they may or may not possess. Either gullibility, or intelligence. Or both. Possibly inversely ?

RedToothBrush · 11/12/2020 12:31

Just leaving this here:

RedToothBrush Thu 16-Jun-16 13:41:39
I want to vote, and vote with conviction.

I think if you are Leave its probably more clear cut.

If you are Remain I think it tends to be an on-balance argument.

Which I think is making it hard for some people as they aren't in the later camp, but they are struggling with the on-balance argument with lots of confusing information. They are not 'YAY GO EU!!! WWWWOOOO!'. Its difficult to muster that excitement. In true I think its disingenuous to suggest you can be that excited about the EU.

The EU is flawed. Its a big monster. But there are big friendly monsters and big horrible monsters.

Leave is not an argument based on 'facts'. Its more of an 'outlook' based more on belief. Its stupid to try and look for them. There is no plan. There is no argument really apart from the propaganda slogan of 'Take Back Control' which in fairness is a very strong and positive one, especially when it sits next to the shitty weakness of the Remain camp's propaganda. What does it actually mean in reality though?

The truth: Not a lot. Its left deliberately open to interpretation, as that means people attach their own meaning to it - and therefore convictions and beliefs. Its to empower the person reading it. But there is little real substance behind it.

'To take back control', in life requires a detailed clear vision and strategy. Yet its nowhere to be seen, and Leave are quite happy to do this as it offers them the opportunity to promise the world (or glittering generalities as the technique is know). What how many times the phrase 'Take Back Control' is going to be repeated in the next week. Its an interesting game for Question Time Viewing!

Then there's the reality. Article 50, which is the mechanism to leave the EU, is heavily weighed against anyone leaving (its therefore not anti-UK). It puts us in a difficult position to make good on the promises of taking control, especially since there are French and German elections in the same period. Us leaving is likely to be met with hostility, even at cost to themselves, to try and prevent others leaving and getting similar 'concessions'. We will, instead of being in control, be the political football of the Germans and French. Who have no obligation to agree anything. If after two years there is no agreement, then we get thrown back into poor terms.

Then you have to consider the implications of politics domestically. I don't think there is any consensus on what the UK actually wants. Its very vague. Before we even get to the negotiation table we will have to settle this. I can't see there being much will to do this or much agreement.

Oh, and as for taking control. We'll get control of Sangatte alright. Only in Folkestone.

I might feel differently if there was a plan either within the Brexit camp or the Remain camp. Instead we have lots of competing and contradictory arguments.

If you are looking for facts over outlook, then I would go Remain. Lots of facts (of varying quality and bias and propaganda) but there are facts. Whether you choose to trust them - and their sources - is another matter. There is a definite split along these lines.

I think Remain are doing a shit campaign. They don't get it. They haven't been honest, and they have tried to scare people instead of just going with what the EU is.

On balance the EU offer us security and stability. Boring as hell but undervalued. If the EU did go tits up, then we would be sucked in regardless. Better to do it with others, in those circumstances. Its more likely to be controlled then. Movement of people is going to be a problem in or out due to a global population that is growing. We are better dealing with those problems on an international basis with people we are on good terms with rather than have just pissed off. Likewise, trying to get back tax from international corporation and tax havens - otherwise it will encourage an every man for himself mentality in the finance world which we have been chipping away at, albeit slowly. Then there's works and human rights. Deregulation will chip away at these. Its not a good thing. It seems to be fair game to talk about the EU in twenty or thirty years. I think its fair game to talk about workers and human rights in twenty or thirty years too.

Then there's this: The referendum looks set to be cut along age lines with the young wanting to stay in. If Brexit win, we loose a generation to political engagement as they feel they have not been listened to. The implications of this are wide ranging. It means few will take up the much needed call to get involved themselves locally. That means they don't get head. It means career politicians will dominate even more. I fear this perhaps more than anything.

Brexit is about trying to draw lines of division to me. Its about trying to other, and trying to use the word 'I' a lot. Rather than looking at what shared grievances we have and what we are all pissed off at, and using that to try and find solutions.

Even in terms of immigration, the them and us thing in terms of integration, requires both sides of the fence to reach out to each other. That's those who identify as White British making a positive effort as much as those coming over here and taking on British culture. Instead Brexit is driving a massive wedge in that. I'm scared some of the strength of negative feeling, so why would anyone from a none white British background feel better about it? It only adds more fuel to the fire.

Finally, there's Scotland and NI and the issues of their sovereignty and safety. I grew up fearing NI terrorism. I don't want to go back to that. I don't want to loose Scotland. I didn't want them to go last year. I still don't. I don't see how England is stronger without either NI and Scotland. I don't want to see friends who are Irish and NI and work across the border area have to make huge decisions.

I am PROUD to be British. I am starting the resent the fact that, I can not be British European and still be proud. Cultures do not disappear with the redrawing of lines on maps. Cultures flourish with trade and the bonds that brings. What makes someone proud to be Welsh? They have managed to maintain and indeed extend that in recent years, whilst still being part of the union. Ditto, Scotland and NI.

I have friends who are European and I see them as every bit as equal. The Little England nationalism is tiresome, and inaccurate anyway. I reject it.

Anyway, MY decision, is not anyone else's decision. But that's where I am. That's why I'm frustrated. I do have certain concerns but they are not going to get fixed in the way people think. Nor is it a decision from being scared.

It boils down to this to me. You can't just overthrown the government - domestic or the EU - with two fingers up, unless you have a credible alternative waiting in the wings with a credible alternative to fill the void.

Where is that? Where is that really?

I just hear a loud echoing silence to that question

And four and a half years on, I'm STILL waiting.

FastMovingLuxuryGoods · 11/12/2020 12:32

@GetOffYourHighHorse

I'm beginning to think that you must be trolling now. No one can be this obtuse.

We can't have a free trade deal because we don't want to do any of the stuff that having a free trade deal requires. We have rejected all. of. it.

This issue has been discussed ENDLESSLY for the last 4 years. I've seen your user name on lots and lots of Brexit threads over that time. Are you seriously saying that you've not understood any of it, at all?

EerieSilence · 11/12/2020 12:32

I really really don't get it.
The EU are trying to get the best deal for them. If the UK are so strong, proud and economically independent, shouldn't they be in advantage, whatever happens?
I sincerely don't understand why the Brexiters are trying to paint the EU as a baddie while at the same time coming from the premise, that the EU is some charity organisation which will just hand over everything to the UK because they are so nice. Seriously - if your money and economical interests are in stake, where will your priorities be?

borntobequiet · 11/12/2020 12:32

@GetOffYourHighHorse

'You can't even explain what trading relationship Norway has with the EU or why the UK rejected a similar system which WAS an option.'

@RedToothBrush you maybe need a break from mn you have taking this situation very badly Flowers.

I of course can't explain things. I'm asking questions! so what? Staying in the EU would have been simpler, but the majority voted leave so we have.

Still wondering why we can't have a free trade deal? anyone other than red who may well combust please answer without any snidey sneering.

We can’t have a free trade deal because we won’t commit to the requirements of a free trade deal. That’s it. Similar to not being able to drive a car on the public highway if you won’t commit to obtaining a driving licence and paying car tax, as the rules stipulate. You can’t just say you will be careful, observe the Highway Code and mend any potholes you encounter out of your own pocket.
Woahisme · 11/12/2020 12:34

The most striking thing about posts like these is that all of this angst and blame and denial could have been avoided. 4 and a half years ago no less. This shit isn't on 48% of the people who voted. My conscience is clear.

MushMonster · 11/12/2020 12:34

They will reach an agreement. It is mutually benefitial and the only way forward. It may not happen by the 31st December though.....
Boris does his moves, so do the EU, right, they can fight for it too, it is their future too. It is the companies who deal between UK and the EU who are unfairly left in limbo, alongside UK citizens. Still noone knwos how we have to prepare, but prepare we must. All clear......Sad

FastMovingLuxuryGoods · 11/12/2020 12:34

@GetOffYourHighHorse

'WHY should they change all of their rules to satisfy a country that's told them to go fuck themselves??'

Because it would be mutually beneficial Confused.

No. It wouldn't.

The four freedoms are INDIVISIBLE.

It would NOT be beneficial from the EU's perspective to break them for a country who wants to leave.

They do not need us as much as we need them. It's a painful reality for many, but it is reality.

borntobequiet · 11/12/2020 12:35

Sorry, road tax not car tax!

RedToothBrush · 11/12/2020 12:36

@GetOffYourHighHorse

'You can't even explain what trading relationship Norway has with the EU or why the UK rejected a similar system which WAS an option.'

@RedToothBrush you maybe need a break from mn you have taking this situation very badly Flowers.

I of course can't explain things. I'm asking questions! so what? Staying in the EU would have been simpler, but the majority voted leave so we have.

Still wondering why we can't have a free trade deal? anyone other than red who may well combust please answer without any snidey sneering.

I'm fine thanks.

I don't need patronising. I am the one who should be doing that ta muchly.

You won't get an answer btw. Because thats the question that we've all been asking for FOUR AND A HALF YEARS and haven't had a reply from government (not parliament) that hasn't been snidey.

You don't get to rock in and say 'oh well why haven't we just done this or that' and get an easy ride over it as if we haven't been asking all these same questions expectantly hoping someone has a magic answer.

These fuckers are just fuckers who happen to like disaster capitalism because it enables corruption.

Our government has more politicians with vested interest in big business/lobby groups than just about any other country in the world than Russia.

THATS where our problem is.

GetOffYourHighHorse · 11/12/2020 12:37

'Shame we didn't get the second referendum '

Yes I think if we had we'd have stayed.

As I've proven (as someone who voted remain) many if not most don’t understand the difference between the many arrangements with various countries.

Your last post was a bit TL;DR red. Try to be a bit more concise and to the point.

RedToothBrush · 11/12/2020 12:38

@GetOffYourHighHorse

'Shame we didn't get the second referendum '

Yes I think if we had we'd have stayed.

As I've proven (as someone who voted remain) many if not most don’t understand the difference between the many arrangements with various countries.

Your last post was a bit TL;DR red. Try to be a bit more concise and to the point.

Stop living in 2016.

Short enough?

RedToothBrush · 11/12/2020 12:39

Or shall I say

'Well I told you so before the referendum'.

Buddytheelf85 · 11/12/2020 12:39

Still wondering why we can't have a free trade deal? anyone other than red who may well combust please answer without any snidey sneering.

Because in order to have completely free movement of capital, goods and services (like other EU countries), you need to accept free movement of people. Those are the four pillars of EU membership. They’re indivisible. Capital, goods, services and people. And we refuse to accept people.

No country has a relationship with the EU where it gets completely free trade (services, goods and capital) without accepting free movement of people. Norway has free trade but accepts free movement of people and contributes to the EU budget. Canada basically has access for goods but not capital or services and we desperately need services because financial services is 7% of our economic output.

GetOffYourHighHorse · 11/12/2020 12:40

'You don't get to rock in and say 'oh well why haven't we just done this or that'

Oh I'm sorry! I thought this was a public chat forum? Have I inadvertently stumbled into a private chat group? 🙄

kungfupannda · 11/12/2020 12:40

@Zilla1for the win!

Even after the travel to remote islands post, I was still wavering over whether it was a wind-up or not.