@TruculentandFarty
It is a little bit like saying blind people should not be heavily involved in issues strongly affecting the blind because blind people are not all alike. I don't think that anyone would argue that local authorities should not consult with blind organizations in their area when (say) making changes to pedestrian crossings.
You are right, and it is important that people who have disabilities are involved in planning, have input into how public information is imparted etc....but just to add to your comparison about blind people being consulted, which of course they should be - would you agree that it might be important to also have a consultation that involves people who are blind but with associated learning disabilities, or physical disabilities, or another sensory impairment, or carers of people who may need lot of support to access the facility and support in getting their interests heard.
We have a new special school being built nearby, and as well as consultation involving the children who will be attending, they also involve parents and carers - those who advocate for their children.
Autism is such an inherent part of him he finds it insulting to have it minimized
It's strange, because ds' condition is very much a part of him, it is quite literally written into genetic code! It affects every single aspect of his life, physical, health behaviour, appearance, communication. But, as with Downs Syndrome, it would seem really wrong to say 'Hazeyboy is Xxxxx' or 'oh oh yes, Hazeyboy's friend is Downs'