Unfair to do pay per mile in remote areas where there are no alternatives
Kazzyhoward this presupposes that people who live rurally and people who live in towns and cities have (or should have) everything equal on every axis, but they don't.
If you live rurally then you almost certainly have a far better quality of air for you and your children, which will have both short-term and long-term benefits for your health and potential longevity.
If you live rurally then you are far more likely to have far greater access to outside space, and a bigger garden, and access to outdoor pursuits.
If you live rurally then your house is likely to be larger for the price you paid.
If you live in a town or city then you will have greater access, across a much shorter distance, to a wide range of facilities, including leisure, retail and education.
If you live in a town or city then you are likely to have much easier access to regular, reliable public transport.
Paying per mile might cost people who live in rural areas more, but greater petrol car use tends to penalise people who live in cities more.