You think the US would do anything about a Muslim woman being debased by airport security? I’m afraid you have no concept what’s happening there if you think that.
I don't think that. What I said is that at least she is a citizen of that country and there are democratic and legal channels through which she can pursue it.
The women forced to submit to intimate/genital examinations in Qatar (and look at the purpose, not to prevent terrorism but to pursue an undoubtedly unmarried mother) have no such channels. As I said their countries can make noise but nothing will be done.
In any case, back in the case you've tried to drag into this (and made no sense whatsoever in claiming it was proof that embassies would not be burned down by Islamic extremists) .... I'm from a culture that was until recently associated with terrorism. The terrorists of course are few and far between/unrepresentative and it's insulting to me and most other people I know from my region to be associated with them, in a way I can imagine most Muslims would feel.aboit being associated with Islamic fundamental terrorism.
However things were as they were in the past (terrorists from my culture/region active) I would understand why security staff might focus on me, and even why they might want to assure themselves that my explanation for padding around my crotch was the true, harmless one. It would be cringeworthy and embarrassing, but I would understand they were trying to do their job - and I'd appreciate that if I were doing their job I'd think "if I take that as gospel, it's becomes known/instant "pass" and terrorists using females (or drug smugglers) etc will default to it. What if it's not the mundane explanation; what if people die or are injured because I didn't check".
This law in Qatar - the reason behind the intimate exams forced on these women in their determination to catch (and punish) that poor woman is a very different kettle of fish.