We currently live in a run down area. Lots of crime, the general area is pretty unloved, and the secondary schools are rough. That's on paper anyway, in actuality, we've found it an OK place to live so far, but we don't have teens yet.
For the longest time, our plan has been to move when the kids reach secondary school age, as we'd rather raise teens in a place where they can have more freedom and less worries about crime, etc. It would be better education-wise, too.
House-wise, we'd gain a little more space by moving. But to move to a 'naice' area (as mumsnet likes to say), we are looking at at the next price bracket up from where we are - it's a difference of around £100k for the same type of house we are in now. There are no cheaper options in between without moving very far away, which we are not prepared to do.
Staying put, we'd be mortgage free by 50. Moving would mean we'd likely be paying off a mortgage until closer to 70. The better financial decision is to stay put, but our hearts tell us moving is the right thing. What would you prioritise in this situation?