I think what all of this thread shows is just how difficult it is to get the right employees for your organisation. In my DH's company there have been mercifully few issues with staff taking time off sick that's not fully justified. They have generous policies for all sorts of things and staff are valued. They are also a major expense. Their people ARE the company. It would ridicuous not to manage this aspect of company spending because it is vital to the company to be profitable and to the employees who value their jobs. The idea that successful companies are successful because they allow huge amounts of sick leave is just not sustainable and no company making losses will employ anyone in the end. Millions of people will be noticing this quite soon - now estimated at 4 million. Only people who are actually worth employing will be retained. Those in employment will be hammered regarding taxation so although grateful for jobs they will feel agrieved when taxes rise.
Making a profit is what companies are set up to do. If employees are not on board with that then obviously a government/state paid role would suit them better.
However, it has been a worrying trait in one of Dh's offices that "taking sickies" has crept in. Only two members of staff but it slowed work up and infuriated the existing staff who needed to get the work out on time and accurate. This type of action by employees must be investigated and challenged because it drags the whole company down.Unfortunately it was discovered that one member of staff had previous form for this in his former company. His work was poor and despite a number attempts at training and coaching, nothing was making the situation better. When ongoing coaching and help was mentioned in his return to work interview, following on from annual review where such asisstance had been put into action, he went sick yet again. He then threatened to take the company to an industrial tribunal for constructive dismissal. He then presumably got legal advice and backed down and the company made his job redundant with no repercussions . The stark truth is, no one wants colleagues like this. He cost a lot regarding coaching, suopervison, training and not completing work on time. Companises simply cannot afford this with numerous employees who do not really want to work and do not respond to support and coaching. The overall feeling was that he wanted a payout for being incompetent thus robbingother people of their profit sharing bonuses. Yes, companies do share profits!
Everyone is sympathetic for a miscarriage. My hairdresser took 6 months off after hers. They were brilliantly understanding. Some issues empolyees have are, I'm afraid, the more minor ups and downs of life. However, not really being interested in your job when everyone else is happy, (productive, very reasonable hours, every chance for promotion and further qualifications, and very well paid) is a problem for employers. It is inevitable that employees who cannot buy into the ethos will have to go.
Posting on facebook is really silly if you are on sick leave. Yes, generous sick leave and full pay for 6 months does change the outlook of some employees. Most see it as a huge benefit and want to work and pull their weight though.