The 45,000 dead - or around 55,000 looking at the ONS - are due to the government locking down far too late
The countries that did well locked down when they had fewer cases
- exponential growth is very unforgiving of dithering and delay.
I live in Germany, which has an excellent health care system, a mix of private & public
We have massive spare capacity
None of that would have been enough if Merkel had locked down a couple of weeks later
In Germany, healthcare is about 12% of GDP, compared to 8-9% for the NHS
We have about 3 x as many doctors, hospital beds and multiple x ICU beds per 100,000 population as the UK
The huge spare capacity meant it didn't turn into the National COVID Service, with little treatment for other ailments.
However you divide up the private / public spend, the UK does not spend enough on healthcare for the level of service that most people demand.
The USA spends about 17% of GDP, so spending a huge amount isn't enough in itself to give good healthcare for all
So a country needs both a sensible system and enough money
Problem is, trying to change from the NHS to a "better" system would probably be chaos, because millions would still need healthcare during the transition
It's much easier to change systems if they can be switched off during the process !
And of course, there might be dubious contracts to political donors and government supporters - whoever is in power - as in the COVID crisis
The frequent reorganisations of the NHS have tended to add on layers of bureaucracy, without noticeable improvement in service,
so I'd need convincing before supporting another one