@endlessginandtonic
I think there is also some tension inherent in the service between medication/non medication.
Which I have been reflecting on since moving to the USA and observing how child mental health is addressed.
My personal view is that the USA is too quick to give dc formal diagnosis and medicate and the UK may actually be too slow.
I don't think the UK's dc would benefit from everything becoming a diagnosis with medication but I do think that there are some dc who would benefit from easier access to medication, which in the area I worked in was extremely hard for anyone to access.
Yes, I found that to generally be true, although of course, our own experience was late on, with the child being nearly 11. Even the UK therapeutic social worker said it was quite a plus that he had got so far without needing medication but that he most definitely needed it then and there, which she nor any of the others could access so he was left without and had been left without it, or the access to further diagnoses of both OCD, which was then obvious, and ADHD, which I had queried several years before with the community paed who simpered at me and told me 'He has autism.' Well, yes, we knew that already.
He only fully benefited from the adjunct therapies once he was stable of the other two conditions a couple of months after starting the drug therapy.
But he's a lucky and privileged child, so many others are not so. What is it costing in total? Because if this child had not been able to access what he has, then he'd already be failing out of school, but now he's able to progress well, his intelligence is not impaired, and has every hope of attending university to pursue his desired goals of engineering.
A mind is a terrible thing to waste.