Ok, I'm ready for the fire... here goes....
I am a parent of a child with autism, this is how I prefer to phrase it. Why? Because my son is a hell of a lot more than that one diagnosis so describing him as autistic plays into the hands of professionals who I need to help him and I need them to do it in a way which is personal to him and not a one size fits all approach. I have to speak for my son because he isn't able to, I would absolutely give anything for him to be as articulate as the posters on here. If the professionals slt, ot, teachers, senco, dietitian etc are able to categorise him they will fail to personalise his support. This is the only reason I care about the labelling because he is more than one diagnosis.
He is classed as having severe autism and yes this is importantant too as he doesn't have a learning disability. He is able to learn. He is actually amazingly bright in some areas. These aren't superpowers though. I would trade these areas for him if I could so that he had other abilities which means he won't need support as an adult and he can be independent. I worry he'll be abused, left in one of those awful group homes etc when I'm not here to hold people to account for how he is treated.
The social model is great but it is just a model and he has to make it through the real world where not everyone will accommodate him. His autism does disable him massively.
I do believe people with autism should have their views and voices listened to but I also think parents should too. The people with autism who are able to voice their opinions have no idea what is like for someone who can't so they are in no position to talk for them ie my son. I am in a position and will advocate for my son with autism as I would for my nt child, fiercely, legally and with my full heart. Someone who has been communicative their whole life, with minor sensory needs and able to hide their autism from the nt community has no idea of the life my son has and possibly their autism by definition hinders that.
Referring to autism not as a disability in order to appease those who can live without support removes support from those with autism whose lives are fully impacted. This is happening quite alot in the states where it has become an easy budget cut and justified by people with autism saying it's not a disability.
I do wonder if part of the problem with the breach between autism advocates and parents is theory of mind component to a diagnosis. Having the diagnosis shows an inability with communication, interaction and social understanding so the ability to understand the position of parents of kids with autism is impacted. This doesn't make your views less relevant but could account for why parents are often seen as the enemy especially those of children at the lower end of the spectrum.
Surely it would be better if parents and adults with autism worked together and shared experiences so future families can raise children with autism with as much support and guidance as possibl and give the children the best opportunities and start in life as possible?
I do think there needs to be a separate diagnosis and a distinction between the top and bottom ends of the spectrum as they are completely different and life outcome are different. In the same way a sprained ankle is different to requiring an amputation. Eg a non communicative person who head bangs and has non sense of danger is unlikely to have the same life outcomes and opportunities as someone who is verbal, articulate and can manage sensory differences with minimal adjustments eg able to get married, hold a job, look after children.
Just for the record there seems to be many arguments between parents of kids a different points on the spectrum too. Whether this is because of the possibility that many parents are undiagnosed who knows but it likely plays a part along side the never ending constant battles parents have for basics like education. There are limited funds and parents want their own children to benefit.
Fully expect come back from some of this but wanted to post to show the other side of the coin too.