It is getting a bit on my nerves now. Are there any statues which would pass the 2020 test of not benefiting from the slave trade or being a racist?
I understand and I don't understand the Colston statue, yes he was responsible for many many black people being enslaved and dying and as a black person in Bristol seeing that statue stirs up feelings of anger etc. But the man was alive 300 years ago, what he did was evil, disgusting, abhorrent but it wasn't illegal or wrong at the time.
We are a country who made its riches from raping and stealing from other countries and we used that wealth to fund the countries own success, to improve build buildings, industry etc. Same with a lot of the other European empires. That needs to be discussed more and I think how comic relief , Oxfam depict some Africa and Asia countries as poor countries who need our 'help', we need to realise how as the western world over centuries we have contributed to this need and the civil wars.
But I do think we should keep our historical figures in place where they are, if they weren't bad at the time and did good at the time.
Please don't equate it, as some have to Saville and Hitler - being a paedophile and necrophilia was/ is wrong , same with gassing 6 million Jews. Again that's not saying black slavery was ever right, but the morals of the world at the time saw it as ok for whatever deluded reason.