Obviously the South-East offers the best quality of life in the country
To phrase this very subjective opinion as some sort of global truth probably qualifies as one of the most ridiculous things I've ever read on here. And if you're happy to take the Quality of Life Index as some kind of unequivocal metric of where is 'good' and 'bad' to live, then you've a very blinkered view of life imho.
I've lived in the south-east and the north-west among other places. I personally found the south-east overcrowded, unfriendly and overpriced with ridiculous traffic. I also found more people there were hung up on money than in other places I've lived in. I know that's going to piss off a lot of people who live there, but that was my personal experience and unlike the OP I'm not trying to dress up my opinions as general truths.
What people seem to forget when they get all hung up on 'quality of living' is that further north many people can afford a larger/nicer property without having to saddle themselves with an insane commute or a massive mortgage. I'd have said this contributes an awful lot to 'quality of life', personally. To say nothing of better scenery, less overcrowding and overpopulation, and (in my opinion anyway) friendlier people.
I live in the Midlands now but my heart is still in the north-west where I grew up. Much friendlier and more down to earth, less pressured and some beautiful places. Again this is my personal experience.
I really don't know why you started this thread other than to be goady OP, your mind clearly is firmly made up on this matter already.
the Midlands is the "North"
Oh, and you need to brush up on your geography.