I do believe face to face time is really important, both student to teacher and student to student. I can only really speak for secondary students but they just are not (for the most part) like uni students, able to just get on with work without any teacher input. Even university students have the odd tutorial.
I also think that expecting teachers to just behave as if teaching in lockdown is just normal school, but from home, is crazy. There are many additional pressures on them and they have no in-house support.
There will always be disadvantaged kids but failing 95% of children because 5% do not have access to the internet or a device is not the optimal solution.
Equally, the catch all excuse of ‘safeguarding’ is lazy and weak. Schools need to do the best they can and parents need to do their part, too, educating their children about online safety and, ideally, at least popping their head around the door and making sure everything is OK.
I think the solution requires imagination and a bit of bravery, especially at Senior levels.
The timetable needs to be changed and much reduced, to reduce the pressure on not only teachers but pupils. Zoom is far more intense than a classroom and pupils cannot focus all day on it.
There also need to be breaks between lessons for recovery and technology issues. Heads and SLT’s need to allow teacher’s flexibility to allow them to deliver lessons the way they want to and not stick to crap like whole school marking policies or particular lesson formats or resources.
Also all school settings will be different. Some schools could elect for a couple of 30 minute slots per day, others would be more like the normal timetable.
This is not rocket science but blaming teachers for implementing unimaginative and lazy strategies from heads and SLTs Is pointless. Most are working hard to deliver what they have been asked to.