Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Dear Sirs

328 replies

Suzanne12 · 16/04/2020 10:45

Is this an acceptable way to start an email that will be received by either a man or a woman? Would you say something if a colleague used this term to send an email to a generic inbox?

Yabu - it's fine
Yanbu - it's not acceptable anymore

OP posts:
scott2609 · 16/04/2020 10:56

It is used very widely still in the legal sector

Firsttimelottie · 16/04/2020 10:57

Recently started a new job. I asked colleague why they all email 'dear sirs' because I didn't realise that was still a thing!

She didn't know why - It's just something that's always been done and it's naturally become a default thing to do.

I write sir / madam.

Reginabambina · 16/04/2020 10:57

Do you work in law? Dear Sirs is standard and gender neutral in legal correspondence and is often used in other correspondence by lawyers seemingly out of habit. There may be other professions with similar conventions.

StVincent · 16/04/2020 10:57

just shows how archaic and enmired in sexism the legal world can be

StVincent · 16/04/2020 10:58

I would let him know you’d prefer he uses a less sexist form of address.

koshkatt · 16/04/2020 10:58

Dear Sirs is standard and gender neutral in legal correspondence

NO. It is not 'gender neutral'. It is sexist and does not acknowledge that women are a thing.

acacac · 16/04/2020 10:58

I’d find it very hard to be offended. To whom it may concern comes across as rude to me.

Suzanne12 · 16/04/2020 10:59

I haven't been at the firm too long but the term was banned in my last firm so I guess that may have made it stand out more to me.

OP posts:
StVincent · 16/04/2020 10:59

How can it be “gender neutral” though Regina? Is “dear ladies” gender neutral as well?

TeaThings · 16/04/2020 10:59

I see someone said its standard use. Why risk alienating some women for the sake of tradition? Using another form of address will make absolutely no difference whatsoever.

I asked male friend what he would think - he’d assume the sender was behind the times.

Seetheprettysnowdrops · 16/04/2020 10:59

I work in a very traditional and bureaucratic place

We would use Dear Sir/Madam if necessary. Never Dear Sirs

StVincent · 16/04/2020 11:00

Yep @koshkatt every time I read it there’s a subtext of “remember how great it was when it was just us men in the workplace”. It’s grinding.

koshkatt · 16/04/2020 11:00

Amazed that some women think that this is ok. Try sending a 'Dear Madams' email to a load of men and see if they think that it is 'gender neutral'.

They will be outraged to a man.

WeBuiltCisCityOnSeeingSouls · 16/04/2020 11:01

I believe that people who think it's fine to assume everyone in a workplace is male, shouldn't be writing business emails. Of course it's fucking sexist.

Deary me.

Spamellahamella · 16/04/2020 11:03

It's not really acceptable but it is how a lot of the old school still do it, including my manager

TeaThings · 16/04/2020 11:03

It’s not standard in all legal correspondence. I noticed letters to my company (in a legal dispute) changed from Dear Sirs to Dear Sir/Madam, when opposing side realised I was on board and clearly not a male.

nakedavengerreturns · 16/04/2020 11:04

Dear Sirs is not gender neutral. Unless you also believe Dear Madams is the same and also gender neutral.

HopelessLayout · 16/04/2020 11:05

Really, both Sir and Madam should become obsolete and a gender-neutral salutation should be devised— How about…

Dear Whom?
Dear Human?
Dear Concerned Party?

HopelessLayout · 16/04/2020 11:06

More importantly, Mr, Mrs, Ms, Miss should all become obsolete. This is far more sexist in my opinion. Why should women be addressed according to their marital status?

thecatsthecats · 16/04/2020 11:06

My old manager used to make sure each and every email sent to "Sirs" was replied to by a woman.

Mind you, we had a female interviewee who was told it was the correct thing to do, and who lacked the knowledge or experience to overrule received wisdom.

nakedavengerreturns · 16/04/2020 11:06

I'm also a lawyer and have never used or received correspondence to 'Sirs'. 'Sir/Madam is quite functional.
In fact at 1990s law school we were specifically advised the archaic form was unacceptable.

Bluntness100 · 16/04/2020 11:06

My daughter is a trainee lawyer and says this is very common in law firms, her company does it, and it’s one of the huge ones.

Likea · 16/04/2020 11:09

Yabu its standard use when writing to generic emails where the gender of the receiver is unknown

welcome to the 21st century, you're not too far behind in your thinking skills regarding equality so you might be able to catch up. There is no GOOD reason to assume a recipient is male.

Ahhashaker · 16/04/2020 11:12

I find it quite rude in this modern day, to me it implies that the sender doesn’t value a woman to be doing the job only men.
My team is entirely female but some clients still address their emails “Dear Sirs” when we have been conversing for months.

m00rfarm · 16/04/2020 11:12

Interesting responses. I have always been taught that if you do not know the person you are writing to, it is Dear Sir with Yours faithfully. If you know the person, it is Dear Mrs Smith with Yours sincerely.

I have always been told that it does not relate to a man, but was the correct way to address a company. I have never been offended by receiving a letter address to Dear Sir if the sender did not know my name. I have, however, been offended by a letter addressed to "To whom it may concern" and "Mr/Mrs"

So - I am a dinosaur. Who knew ...