@HollyGoLoudly1 I completely understand your own confusion - the article is really, really unclear on what was happening.
Agree that asking MNHQ to alter the thread title might help? Or to edit your post. But the fault is media presentation (I can't help wondering if all the journalists really understand the difference themselves, given the quality of the reporting).
The reliable source on the case, from those bringing it, is here. Keira Bell says,
"I have become a claimant in this case because I do not believe that children and young people can consent to the use of powerful and experimental hormone drugs like I did. I believe that the current affirmative system put in place by the Tavistock is inadequate as it does not allow for exploration of these gender dysphoric feelings nor does it seek to find the underlying causes of this condition. Hormone changing drugs and surgery does not work for everyone and it certainly should not be offered to someone under the age of 18 when they are emotionally and mentally vulnerable . The treatment urgently needs to change so that it does not put young people, like me, on a torturous and unnecessary path that is permanent and life changing."