The accommodation itself reportedly needed to be readied plumbing wise etc beforehand, which suggests underuse even if there were a few residents.
You might want to read up on how SARS spread and why plumbing being fixed and properly maintained on is a big issue....
It also highlights why hotels / hospitals are probably not the best place to house people in this way too.
Equally they need to be very close to a hospital due to the nature of the problem - and that makes a military base or the middle of butt fuck nowhere inappropriate.
That doesn't really leave a lot of places tbh. It realistically has to be government owned property due to the nature of the emergency.
I think you have to class this as a 'civil emergency' on the grounds of it being a public health risk given the situation - and therefore I strongly suspect falls under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 Public Health England (PHE) is a Category 1 Responder under the Act in relation to infectious diseases and therefore it is primarily the responsibility of the NHS to provide a solution to providing a suitable quaratined area.
Privately owned facilities - unless they are infrustructure providers such as utilities or transport networks haven't got the same obligation to support such problems - as a first line defence under the Act. If we had a large scale Civil Emergency the CCA provides parliament with the ability to pass directives to potentially order privately owned facilities to be taken into public control for the handling of the emergency.
Therefore legally, unless the Civil Contingency Act is invoked specifically by parliament, there might well be issues about housing potentially infectious people in a hotel because of the issue of contamination both at the outset and after the fact for this reason.
So if the legal responsibility is primarily Public Health England's where else is there apart from somewhere like this? Realistically?
I think its rough on the nhs staff moved, but they couldn't stay in the same building as those quantined. And PHE have to put those under observation during their quaratine period somewhere in line with their LEGAL responsibilities.
Its less about disrespecting NHS staff and more about managing a public health risk in line with the law IMHO.
What is less excusable is the degree of support and assistance given to those kicked out at short notice, who may or may not be able to return to their accomodation in the medium to long term. Being dumped at a great height and being expected to deal with it without proper relocation support in the timescale involved is where the controversy is.