Discourse that focuses on 'services' is missing the point I think. Or some of it anyway.
Clinging to universal credit when it's killing people means that those of us who can work, who either don't need services or don't wish to rely on services which are staffed by people who are unkind and who have had half a day's training on autism and/or LDs (with psychological ideas from the 1980s), and problematic attitudes to physical disability to boot.
Generally a lot of us want to work but we can't all work full time. And it's hard to find work when you face discrimination.
Universal credit makes it a lot harder than working tax credit to stay afloat.
It's more stressful.
Pip makes it a lot harder than DLA.
The discourse around 'welfare' has been woeful.
This is what needs to change so that people with disabilities can feel like valued members of society.
That is what will give us hope.
Listening to people with physical disabilities, learning disabilities, neurodiverse profiles about what worked for us, what helped us into work or into adult lives which have felt meaningful- that will make a difference.
Pouring money into social enterprises of the ilk of the 'foodbank' app which actually penalize people in poverty - that won't help I don't think.
It isn't enough to just 'fund services'. It's the ethos behind how funds are granted. It's the consultation with affected people about how our needs are best met. It is a benefit system that compensates carers including parent carers.
I haven't come across anyone in the Tory party offering that.
I'm not championing labour BTW - I don't mean to say a labour government would automatically do this. But I do think they would have been more compassionate around state benefits and that would have been a good start.