Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Meghan Markle taking Mail On Sunday to Court *MNHQ tweaked title for accuracy*

999 replies

TheMustressMhor · 01/10/2019 23:20

And about time, too. They never stop castigating her.

Prince Harry has said that he's worried that she'll end up being the same kind of victim that his mother was with regard to the Press.

I hope she wins her case.

OP posts:
LaMarschallin · 02/10/2019 20:56

I have personal experience with the Cumberbatch “skeptics”

Yeah, but they're really fickle.

They're going out with Adele now.

LaurieMarlow · 02/10/2019 20:57

Heading off on a tangent but holy crap that Cumberland stuff is nuts.

Who are these whack jobs?

TatianaLarina · 02/10/2019 20:58

Cba to look back to see who that poster is joyful but they are clearly batshit.

TatianaLarina · 02/10/2019 21:00

Well the internet is a form of care in the community isn’t it.

One thing we learn from the internet is quite how many unbalanced people are at large.

TatianaLarina · 02/10/2019 21:00

That was to LaurieMarlow. ^^

LaurieMarlow · 02/10/2019 21:02

One thing we learn from the internet is quite how many unbalanced people are at large.

I guess that’s true. Scary.

joyfullittlehippo · 02/10/2019 21:10

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Pitterpatterpettysteps · 02/10/2019 21:34

There are just as likely to be bots posting here to defend MM than to attack her. Actually I think is particularly likely as it would tally with the modus operandi of her new PR outfit.

There may be a group of malicious individuals that post nasty things about MM - but I very much doubt that they are bots. Who stands to gain from it?

Winterlife · 02/10/2019 21:36

@joyfullittlehippo None of which proves I hate her. I don't. I don't hate anyone. But if your sanctimony makes you feel better, or superior, go for it.

TatianaLarina · 02/10/2019 21:40

It shows you’re very odd Winterlife. You certainly seem to dislike her and have a bizarre level of preoccupation with her.

LaurieMarlow · 02/10/2019 21:40

None of which proves I hate her. I don't

Lol.

However you clearly know her very well to have such insight into her psychology. Are you a long standing friend/family member?

Winterlife · 02/10/2019 21:42

You seem to have spent considerable time reading and believing tabloid cack on the RF or someone who’s not ‘that invested’ in them.

Another poster who knows my life (big ass eyeroll).

I repeat. I. do. not. read. tabloids. For example, I have never read the letter that is the subject of the presumed lawsuit. I didn't read the criticism by MM's surrogates in People magazine about her father, which is what caused him to release the letter. Everything I've read has been reported in mainstream (non UK) press.

I do skim the Daily Mail's US news edition, which is 50% Trump news (which I also don't read) 40% news stories (which I often read), and 10% beauty (which I skim). I never read their celebrity stories.

WotchaTalkinBoutWillis · 02/10/2019 21:42

One thing we learn from the internet is quite how many unbalanced people are at large

Ain't that the truth!
They walk among us.... (scary thought)

TatianaLarina · 02/10/2019 21:44

DM is a tabloid.

All the info you have on Megan is tabloid level which you have clearly believed as well as read.

The good broadsheets here don’t print the baloney you have come out with.

Winterlife · 02/10/2019 21:45

@LaurieMarlow I never claimed to have insights into her psychology.

Most actors are narcissists. But I see this more from how she seeks, and finds, the camera in virtually every photo taken of her. Every time I have seen her in public, she seems to need to be the centre of attention. All of her "woke" talk is why I believe she is manipulative. Granted, I could be wrong, But this is how she presents publicly.

PortiaCastis · 02/10/2019 21:47

Yes I sometimes wonder how people can believe all the crap in the media and it's very odd how they can spout so much venom about someone they've never met.

NoTheresa · 02/10/2019 21:47

So many cheap shots. Lol

QualCheckBot · 02/10/2019 21:48

Winterlife I have never read the letter that is the subject of the presumed lawsuit.

I haven't either. But I'm going to go and google it now!

As I've said before, whats the point in having a RF if you can't have a gossip about them?

WotchaTalkinBoutWillis · 02/10/2019 21:48

I repeat. I. do. not. read. tabloids

Everything I've read has been reported in mainstream (non UK) press

Err.......

Regardless of whether it's non UK or not, you're still soaking up press gossip as gospel by the sounds of it!

NoTheresa · 02/10/2019 21:49

She certainly lurves the camera - or even better the cameras! Plural!

Winterlife · 02/10/2019 21:49

The press I read is not UK based.

And yes, joyful, Meghan is thick waisted. It's not a bad thing, nor a criticism of her. It's merely a body type and an observation. I happen to have close to her body type. She would look much better if she dressed for her body type. If you look at the collection she did for Reitman's years ago, she looked great in those dresses, which were designed for her body type.

No, I don't think she's beautiful. Beauty is rare. But I do think she is very attractive.

TatianaLarina · 02/10/2019 21:50

You need help Winterlife, for real.

ShirleyPhallus · 02/10/2019 21:52

Agreed @TatianaLarina. How can someone be that spiteful about someone they don’t know and have never met? Thick wasted and attention seeking? I guarantee she is 10x more attractive than most of the posters slagging off her looks

WotchaTalkinBoutWillis · 02/10/2019 21:53

The press I read is not UK based

So? What's that got to do with the price of fish?
Promised myself I wouldn't get sucked into another batshit thread, dammit, fail Angry Grin --

NoTheresa · 02/10/2019 21:53

You are all pretty au fait with the gossip columns, *Take a Break which must deserve another special mention et al.