BD67th do you honestly think that the semantics around sexual assault mitigates the effect of the assault?
I'm quoting the law.
A 13 year old boy forcibly penetrated by the fingers of an adult can’t identify as being raped because they’re male,
No, you are also spouting horseshit and I strongly suspect that you are a MRA based on the pattern of word-twisting that you are using. The boy has not been raped because his assailant did not use his penis, not because the boy is male.
the effect and impact are the same.
Are they? Will that boy fear pregnancy? Will he worry that he might contract HIV from his attacker ejaculating into his anus? To observe that physical reality is not to deny the boy's psychological trauma btw.
You come across as wanting to distinguish the two as though that has some importance
I have already noted that assault by penetration is a crime with the same sentencing options as rape. The boy would have been assaulted by penetration, as such he would have the same right to police reporting and support as any other survivor. The difference between the two is important: only rape can leave a victim pregnant or leave ejaculate inside the victim to pass on STIs.