It just makes me realise that alot of people on this website clearly are completely out of touch with issues that are effecting the lower income families and people receiving any kind of support.
This thread is getting ridiculous now, but it’s very telling that you presume people who are in favour of the two child limit are coming from a position of privilege. Perhaps some of them grew up in poverty and believe that anything that incentivises adults who can’t afford kids to continue bringing them into the world isn’t such a good idea. Or perhaps, just perhaps, some have been in abject poverty and knew it’d be irredeemably selfish to have gotten pregnant and had a baby when they couldn’t provide, so waited until their circumstances were better before procreating. You may like to imagine the only people in favour of this are the privileged who’ve lived in ivory towers their whole lives but speaking for myself, you couldn’t be more wrong with that assumption.
Have you forgotten that you are no better than any animal on this planet. Would you tell the hungry lion to stop having cubs. That's what we are just animals who think they know it all.
The most ridiculous attempt at an argument I’ve seen on this thread yet. I certainly don’t believe I’m any better than any other animal (and I’d be willing to bet I live my life in accordance with that belief more consistently than you do), but I’m not stupid enough to think we possess exactly the same mental faculties as a lion. As far as we know, lions don’t have the mental capacity to weigh up whether or not to have cubs, nonhuman animals follow their instinct to have sex and babies follow. They can’t use contraception FGS. Are you really trying to equate other animals following their instinct and having sex and then having babies with human procreation? When we are able to actually think ahead of time whether we want to or can afford to bring a child into the world, and can take steps to prevent that? Going by your logic humans can’t be expected to do any thinking whatsoever beyond going along with lust and therefore it’s okay to pop out as many children as you can physically manage. Because we’re no different to animals, right 
Meanwhile, in the real world, humans have been taking advantage of contraception for hundreds, probably thousands of years, as we are self aware and conscious to understand that when we have a baby that baby is our responsibility, nobody else’s, and decent people don’t want to create a new person who will be born into suffering when they can’t provide for them.
Your own approach of ‘follow your instincts like a lion and who gives a fuck who ends up hurt as a result’ is what’s vile. I don’t think I’m above anyone. I do think that having children is a massive responsibility not to be taken lightly and that prospective parents owe their children, at the very least, some consideration over whether they can afford to put food in their bellies, keep a roof over their head, water in the taps etc. before having unprotected sex. And despite the few dissenters on this thread that’s a very common, reasonable and not at all extreme view. It’s just thinking of others and not just yourself.