But if you decide in advance that you want an epidural, for example, then that goes with an increased risk of further interventions. It’s a trade off. Ditto if you go for an induction
Ah, so it's all our own faults if it goes tremendously wrong, is it? We Should just have bitten down on sticks and all would have been well?
Ha! My daughter and I would be dead if I hadn't let them induce her after hours of labour. And if you haven't been induced, you have NO IDEA of the pain caused which makes Epidurals frequently necessary at that point.
The bollocks about a non-intervention birth being "better for me because it was what I wanted" is utterly self-congratulatory. Would that person feel the same if it was necessary to have had an EMCS to save life?
Talking about interventions as if they are all a choice the mother can make, with no bearing on her or the child's life, and that she "reaps what she sows", is the type of bollocks which does make some women feel shit.
Such attitudes make my blood boil. The best delivery is the safest delivery. Whilst I was utterly traumatised from my induction and EMCS, I realised it was only the judgement of others which made me feel like I had failed - especially from those women who had had no intervention and suggested it was somehow a failing to do ao, rather then luck.
What Really matters is the baby and mum being alive and ok at the end.