Hersymphony without using and remainers soundbites please explain why we should just revoke and ignore the majority of the people who voted. Just to save time I’ll answer some of your predictable comments below:
The referendum was advisory - we were promised it would be acted upon, it has been acted upon therefore parliament itself has accepted the advise and put through legislation to come out of the EU
We didn’t say what kind of Brexit - no this wasn’t discussed in detail but one of the main arguments was to stop uncontrolled immigration which removes most alternatives to what has been termed a hard nasty evil unfeeling Brexit as opposed to a nice gentle fluffy soft one (see how we have been quietly brain washed by language here over the last three years.) Tbh I think most people would have predicted we would just leave (now emotively termed crashing out) then negotiate new terms with the EU. Technically we might be able to have a customs union but it ties our hands in respect of one of the many advantages to Brexit - see most recently the EU Japan customs deal which benefits mainly France and Germany and penalises countries where japan have made large inward investments in the auto industry.
But the bus.... tbh I can’t actually remember the bus. But it had a low quote of the gross figure sent to the EU and likely to be the real figure if we revoke as it’s unlikely our heavily negotiated rebate would be reinstated if we went crawling back. And yes we should be funding the NHS instead of the EU who really do not have our backs
We now have more facts about the position - actually we don’t. The institution we have voted to leave is still the same, with the same vision for its future, the same political and legal system and the same economics. We still don’t know what our future deal will be, we have details on what the deal they will give us to cover the temporary transition period whilst we sort out the actual relationship, obviously totally different things
But bigger is better, not always it isn’t if the other members are so very different from us in terms of economies legal systems and politics. But just in case you’re worried about us being lonely we are still members of the commonwealth with out joint head of state - this is about 1/3of the worlds population of o recall correctly. We’re still members of nato the g8 etc.
I pressure you have moved beyond the thick and racist comments.
The GFA no one is putting a hard border there, despite threats no one will
Breach an international peace treaty, the WA does deal with it - poorly but it’s there to give us time to sort the issue with technology. May has said in a no deal situation we will not put a hard border there the EU will have to sort if it wants one. The Eu will not breach and international peace treaty, or do you think they are that ruthless?
Russia funded the leave campaign - the Uk government funded the remain campaign so both sides were state sponsored then!
The leave campaign was based on lies. - so unlike the remain side which sold the position that we would be better off with the status quo but with no explanation even if we stayed that status quo would change
But we will end up with a recession - if I recall correctly we should have been in recession for the past 3 years. Obviously we would never be in recession as members of the Eu. The economy is cyclical with intermittent recessions which could be triggered by a number of things where the pressure has built up.