I don't like to bash big weddings or people who have them, but small weddings do have the edge (IMO.) I do much prefer them
Reason being is because there seems to be a lot less stress, hassle, expense, and fuss. Easier to organise, and less worries about things going wrong, (because there is not much to worry about!) Just a couple of dozen guests, flowers that you got yourself a few days before, a £100 dress from ASOS, a £100 suit from Debenhams, a £15 a head meal at the local pub, and a friend taking pics. (And a honeymoon a few weeks later in Spain or the Lake District or whatever the couple fancy!)
Some people will be offended of course, (at not being invited,) because with a small wedding, some people will have to be excluded. But it's tough.
@MafaldaGregorovitch
Hope you have a great wedding and a lovely marriage! A small wedding sounds fab. I know it's 'each to their own,' but I still have no idea why people HAVE massive weddings, that cost 10's of 1000s of pounds, with 200 people invited, who they rarely see/don't even like, and lots of extras (like photo booths and chocolate fountains and 10 bridesmaids, videographer, expensive photographer, over-priced fancy hotel venue, event planner, and a £50 a head reception/wedding breakfast.) As I said each to their own, but I don't get it.
I think small, intimate, inexpensive, romantic weddings are becoming much more fashionable now, as people don't have as much surplus income, parents no longer have the funds to pay for their adult child's wedding, and people have started to realise a big, fancy, OTT, expensive wedding, does not guarantee a successful and happy marriage, any more than an inexpensive one.