This sits uneasy with me for many reasons. I do remember there was a promise before the referendum that whatever the outcome, it would be honoured so not honouring it I find troubling and it does seem undemocratic.
I know there will be responses about the good of the country but does that ‘trump’ a democratic vote? That’s one of the things I have been wrestling with. (not that I can change anything anyway).
Look, this argument might stand up if the referendum had been above board at the time, was legally binding, and there were conditions set out before it for what constitutes an acceptable majority to take action.
Not enacting a flawed vote, based on outright lies, that won with a small majority does not fly in the face of democracy, it upholds it. This seems to be a favoured argument for so many, but honestly it is really nonsensical.
As was already said up thread, democracy is not the same thing as majority rule. Holding to a vote that happened before all the implications were truly understood, based on a small majority of the turnout (not a majority of the population) is utter lunacy, and actually undermines democracy.