I get a bit worried about people who support tolerance then slag off Scientologists.
Are people here really saying that the validity of a faith is a function of the number of people who believe it ?
Is it all right to be nasty to them because they don't do suicide bombing like some Moslems, or kidnap and torture random Moslems like some Evangelicals do in Guantanamo Bay ?
Do Scientologists put bombs on school buses like Christian terrorists have done in this country ?
I can't think of a single act of violence organised by Scientologists. I suppose there must be, and Blu & Co will no doubt tell me, but they are amateurs in comparison to the big faiths.
Nicole Kidman wasn't stoned to death for infidelity was she ?
They do try to convert people, but their methods aren't that different from some Christian sects who presumably they stole them from.
Some of their activities are nakedly commercial and look fraudulent. But look at Lourdes, Knock and the way that several religions charge money to "approve" foods, and to marry and bury people.
Ask yourself where did the money for all those big pretty churches come from ? Selling raffle tickets ?
I'm not defending Scientology's beliefs which to me look like they picked the wrong SciFi author to follow, but they are genuine beliefs.
It is a dangerous road to go along. If you say that only big vicious faiths get respect, then you will get big vicious faiths, and smaller nastier ones as well.