Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Duke of Edinburgh’s Road Accident

999 replies

SirGawain · 17/01/2019 18:08

AIBU to ask why on earth is the Duke of Edinburgh driving at the age of 97.

OP posts:
Charlie97 · 18/01/2019 11:52

But driving while under the influence of advanced age is not a crime

No but if you don't tell DVLA of any medical conditions (common with 97 year olds, cataracts, reduced mobility etc) it is an offence if you have an accident and you are found to have not disclosed these.

I don't think the Duke will be sent to the Tower though!

DaffydownClock · 18/01/2019 11:53

100% DoE's fault, he pulled out from a side road. He's very lucky no one was seriously hurt or killed.
I bet it's all hushed up because of who he is; I can't see him turning up to court.
I struggle to understand why once you get to 70 you pretty much self certify yourself to be safe to drive and little is done to actually see what your driving is actually like! I know a driving instructor who's assessed elderly drivers and he says that some are quite frankly lethal driving but too pigheaded to acknowledge it.
My MIL was banned by the family (who had to report her to the DVLA and get her GP to tell her too) because her attitude was 'If you're destined to die being hit by me driving a car then God's ordained that' Quite frankly appalling butthen she went to church twice a week which absolved her from being an absolute cow

Charlie97 · 18/01/2019 11:53

I missed out you can be prosecuted if not disclosed.

WitchesWeb · 18/01/2019 11:55

All these little old people grimly hanging on to their right to drive
what about the rights of other people not to be totalled by little old people who should not be driving

All these young people driving around dangerously.

What about the rights of other people not to be totalled by young people driving around dangerously.

My DBro has life changing injuries from being hit in the side by a young driver who 'didn't see' the lights were on red.

I had a car written off by a young driver who decided it was a good idea to reverse into me without checking mirrors first.

FlamingJuno · 18/01/2019 12:02

As others have said, the chances of DoE having no mental or physical impairments that would affect his ability to drive at the age of 97 are remote. However, as we all know, road conditions, weather, visibility etc impact all of us, regardless of our age and it may be simply that he was dazzled by the low sun and made an error of judgment. We don't even know that it was his mistake that caused the accident. I don't think it's a minor collision when someone ends up with a fracture. If a fracture happens in a workplace, that's designated "serious" not "minor".

Where we live there are many older / elderly drivers. DH was minding his own business walking to the bank one day (on the pavement) when an elderly lady turned the corner, mounted the kerb and knocked him down. She drove on, completely oblivious to what had happened Shock. A passer-by helped DH up and both of them were just WTAF at the whole thing. It was the fact that the driver seemed to have no awareness as much as the issue of driving up the pavement that shocked them.

Another one recently drove into a parking spot at the station, hit the accelerator instead of the brake and went through the railings onto the platform. Luckily nobody was hurt but that could have been horrific.

I'm not sure what the answer is, but would be in favour of 10 yearly re-testing for everybody, regardless of age.

Wordthe · 18/01/2019 12:05

Without question cars and driving are very dangerous
that's why I avoid it at all costs

SillySallySingsSongs · 18/01/2019 12:08

I'm not sure what the answer is, but would be in favour of 10 yearly re-testing for everybody, regardless of age.

I agree with this. How many people also drive around not wearing glasses when they should? How many people don't have regular eyechecks?

DarienGap · 18/01/2019 12:08

Of course DOE won't get the blame for the accident
Doncha know the royals are perfect and can do no wrong Grin

TaMereAPoilDevantPrisu · 18/01/2019 12:09

In terms of statistics, it'd be interesting to compare a) the numbers of drivers under 25 and over 80 and b) the number of miles they do. I'd be willing to bet that if you build those factors in then elderly drivers don't look so good.

pallisers · 18/01/2019 12:16

I agree with this. How many people also drive around not wearing glasses when they should? How many people don't have regular eyechecks?

Don't you have to take an eyetest when you renew your licence? Where I live it is an offence not to wear your glasses when driving if your licence says you need them.

Anapurna · 18/01/2019 12:21

It would be too expensive to implement but if only there could be a compulsory •fit for driving test• for people aged 70 and over.
And that should include all members of the Royal Family.

SillySallySingsSongs · 18/01/2019 12:21

Don't you have to take an eyetest when you renew your licence?

No. Renewal is an online form.

Bluelady · 18/01/2019 12:22

Once more @Bitoutofpractice, it's not all about you - or even a little bit, come to that.

KrystalTipps · 18/01/2019 12:24

It's the royal protection officer I feel sorry for (I'm pretty certain they said last night there was one with him) - I know I wouldn't be happy being driven around by a 97 year old (and I am an 'oldie by the way) and be unable to say no! I was shocked that everyone had walked away uninjured - it looked pretty bad.

Kazzyhoward · 18/01/2019 12:27

It would be too expensive to implement but if only there could be a compulsory •fit for driving test• for people aged 70 and over.

You'd just charge the same for re-tests as you do for first timers. Extend it to everyone to be retested every 10 years. If you want to stay driving, then you pay for a retest. Simples.

myusernameisnotmyusername · 18/01/2019 12:27

A person in the other car had a broken wrist. What gets me is the headlines screaming he was in an accident 'but he's ok'. Since when is it all about him?

pallisers · 18/01/2019 12:28

No. Renewal is an online form.

really? Forever and ever? We have to go in person and do the vision test every ten years. and you have to renew in person every 5 years after the age of 75.

badlydrawnperson · 18/01/2019 12:28

I'm not sure what the answer is, but would be in favour of 10 yearly re-testing for everybody, regardless of age.

This gets trotted out regularly - it would be impossible to do in practical terms - what about all the people who failed and then lost their jobs etc?
How many retests would you allow?

Banana8080 · 18/01/2019 12:28

Agree!!!!!!

badlydrawnperson · 18/01/2019 12:29

We have to go in person and do the vision test every ten years. and you have to renew in person every 5 years after the age of 75.

We have repeatedly proven in elections that we refuse to pay enough tax to support this sort of admin.

badlydrawnperson · 18/01/2019 12:32

You'd just charge the same for re-tests as you do for first timers. Extend it to everyone to be retested every 10 years. If you want to stay driving, then you pay for a retest. Simples

But it's not simples at all. Lots of people took several goes to pass their test - what if they have to have several goes to pass the re-test? Are they allowed to carry on in the interim?
You're going to have to allow people to do multiple tests on the same day surely unless you are going to stop them driving until they pass again. Enforcement would be a nightmare and you'd no doubt have plenty (more) people driving without a licence. People advocating this haven't thought it through - if it was "simples" it'd have been done.

badlydrawnperson · 18/01/2019 12:33

It's the royal protection officer I feel sorry for (I'm pretty certain they said last night there was one with him) - I know I wouldn't be happy being driven around by a 97 year old (and I am an 'oldie by the way) and be unable to say no! I was shocked that everyone had walked away uninjured - it looked pretty bad.
He was alone in the car - protection folk were in a Discovery behind him.

ExFury · 18/01/2019 12:34

If he was so doddery that he shouldn’t be driving the queen would either put a stop to it or would put shit in place to have outriders close roads or slow other cars to allow him to go out.

She’s never allow the risk of bad publicity if he was clearly unfit to drive

Wordthe · 18/01/2019 12:34

Potentially we could have some sort of monitoring system in cars which alerts us to the fact that our attention isn't what it should be..... or something like that

NigellasGuest · 18/01/2019 12:37

There was a baby in the other car, it could have been dreadful.

Swipe left for the next trending thread