"It wouldn’t matter I’d parents work tho would it as they would need to have someone home for the kids getting in . So someone should be at home anyway ." Says who?!
No at this age they're perfectly fine walking home alone and being home alone for I'd say a couple hours! My dd had a key from age 10 and even though I was mostly home, she was perfectly capable of letting herself in and seeing to herself until I got home if I wasn't.
The creeping ridiculous infantilising of children and ignoring of parents common sense and knowledge of THEIR children is getting bloody ridiculous!
I'm in Scotland too. For high school my dd had a 30/40 min walk to school inc crossing 2 busy roads (with crossings) she'd get the bus if it was foul weather. To go from last year of primary having your mother collect you (which most this age would also find mortifying) to full independence for high school is ridiculous and potentially affect children's confidence where they don't think they're capable of it.
This HT needs a hefty dose of common sense (and some good scots plain talking!)
If it were me I'd be arranging a delegation of parents all wanting to see head at same time and refusing to leave until they did! No warning - lead HT be inconvenienced by their own inconvenient and nonsensical policy. And all say you're refusing to do this, it's unnecessary and not their right to set such a policy.
Alternatively all refuse to collect the kids (let the kids know in advance) and as pp says let him call SS or whoever and make a Pratt of himself!
"Miss cherry things have changed a lot since the 70s" no they actually haven't! Children are no more at risk now from paedophiles, kidnappers, fires in the home etc than they were then - if anything they're safer! Because we're now more aware of the risks and teach them so AND electrics etc are safer. The only thing SLIGHTLY more dangerous now is re road safety and again if children are taught to negotiate roads safely and by sounds of it not an issue in this case then the children are perfectly capable of negotiating traffic/crossings (which they'll have to come high school age) too!
"and the last couple of years they have had a police escorts walking with them . I think the safer the better" why ON EARTH would they need police escorts? What a ridiculous waste of resources! I'd love to see proof this is happening in uk as I'm highly sceptical!
"Like yourself you weapon" 😂
I strongly suspect it's kids with overprotective parents who are MORE at risk cos they don't learn street smarts!
Bananasinpyjamas do you have a child this age or older? The type of children you're talking about are not going to be protected by this policy from their parents neglect. You can't overprotect everyone else because of a neglected minority.
"for really what is a minor inconvenience to you." That's not the only reason it's a bad idea. But given the current economic climate it could well cause major problems for a family on a low income who's parents are working when they're finishing school, because they REASONABLY have assessed that works for THEIR family.
"A Head saying that these kids need protecting by saying all kids need to be picked up"
A - is not his job
B - is not how such a situation must be handled
C - is not an acceptable or practical reason for doing this.