So mathanxiety, are you saying that those of us without children should automatically be expected to do the unsocial shifts to cover those with children?
If the shifts are absolutely necessary and everyone is equally committed to the business, why wouldn't you be willing to support (1) those among your fellow women who have no options for childcare and (2) the business on which your livelihood depends.
So 'Yes', basically.
Do you think single mothers are all out carousing while you are slaving away?
If you were paid appropriately for the hours, why would you be resentful?
Expecting people to "make it work" amounts to the placing of an additional barrier to employment on single mothers and even many who have a partner.
The thought of a woman phoning to wake up children and make sure they got up and out to school is frankly appalling and I am stunned that anyone would consider this ok.
How lucky that woman was that she didn't have toddlers to manage by phone
.
I honestly don't see why opting out of chaperoning an unnecessary and inconveniently timed outing because of childcare responsibilities is a problem, Arthur2shedsJackson.
What was this woman going to do with her children while chaperoning other people's children?
What has her motivation in joining the PTA to do with the basic issue of availability of someone to take care of her children in her absence?
The expectation that people who volunteer their time should be able to afford childcare and have childcare lined up to call on for any occasion is one of the main reasons why many talented women steer clear of volunteering in schools and other community organisations.
And to the person upthread who complained about grandparents who have grandchildren to take care of one day a week, do you realise that without free childcare provided by grandparents for a day or two per week, many parents would simply not be able to afford to work?