The two biggest contributors to the reduction in SIDS have been back to sleep and no smoking.
The talk of not having a routine for over a year and how putting a baby in their bedroom alone being dangerous is hysterical and unnecessary.
And (and I realise this will not be popular) but IMO the vast, vast majority of sleep issues are caused by the parents refusing to actually allow their babies to sleep. Sitting with them in light rooms, not putting them to sleep in a quiet dark place, and before you know it the sleep routine becomes one of screaming and parents walking round the room/the block/driving down the m25 for peace and quiet.
I find it remarkable that co sleeping is also upheld as something which parents should absolutely not do, and yet dare go against that idea and you will be flamed to hell and back on here.
The only reason why there are safe co sleeping guidelines is because people will do it anyway and the campaigners know that they’re wasting their time. But co sleeping is far more dangerous than putting a baby to sleep in a quiet place with a baby monitor, except that babies who die co sleeping are not recorded as SIDS deaths.
Losing a baby to SIDS is absolutely tragic for anyone who has been through it. But given they actually cannot pinpoint a reason you can absolutely never state that x or y factor contributed. And babies do still die of SIDS even when parents are in the room.
OP ignore the people telling you you’re putting your baby in danger and piling on the guilt as to how terrible you’ll feel if something happens.
And absolutely ignore anyone who tells you that putting a baby into a routine under the age of one is wrong.
Do what works for you. You’re not actually putting your child in danger. Everything we do comes with risks and pitfalls. You have to go with the ones which work for you, and if your baby is more settled falling asleep in a quiet place then do that.