Ginger You haven’t the first clue what you’re talking about do you?
I asked you a question. You reply by insulting me?
Because you really do look a bit of a dick defending women who it’s well known are crooked to anyone with the vaguest interests in current affairs
Any chance of a civilised, adult debate without name calling? It's pretty poor form.
If it's not clear: of course I know about Tina Green's own involvement. I was simply surprised to read your view that she was MORE culpable of tax avoidance than her husband. I've only ever read reports that point to an equal awareness of their complex fiscal arrangements, despite the names on the documents.
Anyway. Can you point to where I defend Tina Green?