Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Aibu to be amazed by this attitude to working mums?

136 replies

princessmum1 · 28/09/2018 21:27

Just so amazed by this.

Post on a local mums group I’m on about 30 hours funding etc. Normal question.

Someone comments ‘I personally don’t understand why parents don’t wait until their child is at school they’re missing out on so much! 😞 x’

Then goes on to say ‘That’s what benefits are for. I personally can’t wait to get back to work but spending quality time with my children is a lot more important to me x’

Ummm.

I would love to stay at home until my kids start school.

But I can’t. I need to earn money. To pay for things.

Stalked her on facebook. Has a nice 3 bedroom house, most likely housing association with rent paid by benefits. Am I being unreasonable to be slightly angry that I work extremely hard in a full time job, to pay my mortgage, pay £1000 a month childcare, have little money left at the end of the month and I only have a small two bedroom flat. (South east)

It almost makes me want to just quit. But I won’t. Because I think you have to work for things in life. And benefits are there for people having a hard time in unforeseen circumstances. NOT because you want to be at home with your children until they’re at school. I know technically speaking I’m doing very well to be a home owner where I live, single parent and still work.

Anyway...

OP posts:
Allineedyoutodois · 29/09/2018 13:45

Move on and ignore. I grew up on an estate where many people with kids and on benefits got more money than my parents who both worked. However, as time moved on and my mum and dad got better jobs, better pay they were able to save for a little house up the road, and stop renting a council house. Then we could afford a car, and some activities etc. But the people on benefits were left struggling on benefits still, with less money as their kids turned 16, and found it hard to get decent work with no skills or experience. Being on benefits long term sucks, it takes away opportunities, is poor role modelling for kids, and can really hurt someone's self confidence and pride not paying their own way. It's not something to be jealous of in my experience. Kids I grew up with are now adults living on benefits with children of their own. And on it goes. It can be a hard cycle to break. Benefits are a safety net, which defoo should be there, but as a lifestyle choice? A crappy one.

unlimiteddilutingjuice · 29/09/2018 16:53

@unlimiteddilutingjuice I thought it was 4 years old that you had to change from Income Support to signing on? Has it recently changed as that’s what I was told when I was on IS 2 years ago

I just checked and its definitely 5. I'm not sure if it's changed. Generally the direction of change is from less to more restrictive though- not the other way around!

unlimiteddilutingjuice · 29/09/2018 16:55

Out of interet, does this apply only to women, or to men too if they are sahd?

It applies to the main carer of the child. So a lone parent of either gender obviously. In a couple you can choose which partner is looking for work and which is staying home with the kids.

BlaaBlaaBlaa · 29/09/2018 18:22

@unlimited does it have to be a choice? Must one stay at home?

huggybear · 29/09/2018 18:34

It's fine to be a SAHM IF you can afford it. It is not ok to ask the public to pay simply because you don't want to work. I've never encountered anyone with this attitude!

Satsumaeater · 29/09/2018 19:04

You don’t have to seek work until your child is in full time school

Well you kind of do if you want to eat.

We don't all want to live off the State or a man. Neither are that reliable, really. Personally I'd rather rely on myself.

unlimiteddilutingjuice · 29/09/2018 19:05

Blaablaablaa

In a joint JSA claim one adult has to be actively looking for work and will be made to evidence this when they show up to sign on.
The other partner doesn't have to stay at home. They won't stop you looking for work if you choose to. You just aren't under any obligation.

I don't have much experience with Universal Credit but it seems to work the same way. One partner is considered the "lead carer" and the other is a "relevant carer". This difference in status is reflected in the claimant commitment.

Thinking about it now, it does seem a bit odd that you can't choose to split the work seeking.
For eg: me and DH both work part time and share childcare 50/50. If we were unemployed, the jobcentre wouldn't accept that as valid asperation.

Satsumaeater · 29/09/2018 19:05

It's fine to be a SAHM IF you can afford it. It is not ok to ask the public to pay simply because you don't want to work. I've never encountered anyone with this attitude

I did once, years ago on MN. it must have been back in about 2003. Someone said they lived off benefits because it was more important to be with their kids than to maintain themselves. I think they did have a partner who earned money, but they couldn't have stayed at home without the benefits. That said, I thought to get benefits you had to be available for work, and if you're not and not disabled, you won't get them?

Badhairday77 · 29/09/2018 19:16

Everybody has a tight to their own opinion. I would just ignore.
At least your mortgage will be paid off eventually and you will have an asset.

Badhairday77 · 29/09/2018 19:16

Right not tight

BishopBrennansArse · 29/09/2018 19:41

Try it, OP. Granted DS1 was unplanned but once he arrived we planned the rest of our family so I could have the number of kids I wanted and go back to work asap.

Then came disability.

Benefits are not a walk in the park. Not even close...

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread