The EU is not doing great in popularity terms amongst the people of its member states. We’re not even the country where it is most unpopular. If they got themselves into a situation where they were effectively creating a blockade and people in the U.K. were starving because of it how do you think that would affect their image?
Similar situation have happened in the past. Ireland (who weren’t overly keen on being part of a larger union if you remember) had the potato famine. We in England stood by as the potato crop was destroyed and refused to import the wheat needed to save them because of trade laws and agreements and a desire to protect the interests of the rich.
Also Stalin’s blockade of West Berlin leading to the Berlin airlift in the late ‘40s.
Now I don’t think that emulating one of the worst crimes of the British Empire or aping Stalin is really a look that an organisation with a wobbly reputation wants to adopt.
I think it’s almost impossible these doomsday scenarios of starvation and death would happen. It would lead to worldwide condemnation and destroy the EUs image.
Quite frankly, if the EU were prepared to allow a situation like that to happen it would be a virtual holocaust and a crime against humanity. It would put them right up there with some of the most evil regimes in history and it would make them a worldwide pariah.
I really cannot understand why anybody would think that the threat of the EU creating a blockade stopping food coming to the U.K. is an argument for staying in the EU.
OP, if you really believe the EU would allow this to happen, why on earth do you think they are a good thing and something we wanted to be part of? It’s just so completely illogical I find it difficult to comprehend?
The much more likely scenario is that in the event of a Corbyn GE win there would be a run on the pound (even John McDonell admits that) and we won’t be able to afford food anymore. But I bet you still vote Labour don’t you?