I see what you are trying to say but the article does not actually blame Wakefield for current scepticism. All it says is this:
"Particular concerns have been raised about young people who form part of the unprotected “Wakefield cohort”, whose parents failed to get them vaccinated as children after the disgraced former doctor Andrew Wakefield falsely claimed that the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine caused autism in the 1990s"
This is because in the wake of Wakefield (no pun intended!) MMR vaccination rates dropped by about 10% in the UK. Therefore people who were born at around that time have a lower vaccination rate in their cohort and are more likely to be at risk as an age group. It's not saying those people are solely responsible for the outbreak, as I read it, but that people of that age group are more vulnerable in an outbreak.
It was actually quite relevant in Italy because the Wakefield scare had a big impact there - a court allowed compensation to parents of an autistic child before the Lancet article was retracted. The decision was later quashed once Wakefield was struck off but it seems to have left a lasting impression there - vaccination rates actually recovered better in the UK than in Italy. But, I think the article is talking about vaccine fear more generally. It does refer to populist movements which have contributed to renewed scepticism but it doesn't refer to the religious movements in Romania which are also anti vaccination and having a big impact, nor the social factors there which can lead to lower vaccination rates.