I like Jordan Peterson AIBU?

[NeatFreakMama]

With his rise to fame recently it seems like Jordan Peterson is everywhere. Personally I really enjoyed his book and I find his lectures fascinating largely, I think for me, because he's a great orator.

I know he has his detractors and I'd be really interested to hear their opinions on him. I don't really see much not to like about his rhetoric; it feels like he tends to speak mostly on universal truths but just in a really engaging way?

No idea who he is

Never heard of him.

Haha I taken back my 'seems like he's everywhere' comment then

I like him too.

I don't get out much, though.

Awwlookatmybabyspider I think not getting out much might be the reason I know who he is as I get stuck on YouTube video way too frequently!

I like him too. He's not afraid to work through an argument and the implications of what people say logically, and he's very good at keeping a clear head whilst he does it.

As far as I can tell, people dislike him because their opinions are based on emotion rather than any kind of logic.

allertse I think you're right. I had a friend say that he didn't like him because he changes his mind if someone provides an alternative fact and I would have thought that was a great quality to have. I like a decent debate and if one side is immovable, even when presented with a new reality, then it's not much of a debate.

I've never understood that comment. Its how everyone reacts. Emotions happen first, then cognitive thought.

He's great!

UpstartCrow I think it's that someone's opinion of a topic should be based on evidence based facts/ truth rather than emotion (where they're different).

I don't exactly agree with all of his views, but he makes his arguments with sound reasoning and logic and isn't afraid to put his point across in hostile environments, so I admire him for that.

I love him!
Loved his book. Love his interviews.
Intelligent, articulate man

I alsl think he talks a lot of sense. He is misquoted and deliberately misunderstood frequently unfortunately.

I think he's great. I also don't agree with everything he says, but why is that a bad thing? The line of thinking - that you must agree with someone 100% or you cannot agree on anything at all - is illogical.

I've read some of his work.

Unflappable, intelligent man.

AvtarRamKaur yes good point, I totally agree with you. I think I was interested in what people didn't agree with only because I've not seen anything yet I didn't; although it's definitely possible!

I am not taken with his manner. Thats probably a reflection my upbringing, but I respond more favourably to someone who speaks to me as an equal than I feel shows signs of arrogance. I have only seen a few lectures but in those he has often been assertive in a way that makes me uncomfortable, as though others present won't have thought of the things he has said.

I love him. He is so passionate and really cares about people.

Oh and some of his best Appearances aren't on Channel 4 news or even his lectures, but his long form discussions with the likes of Joe Rogan and Dave Rubin are great. (All on you tube)

YANBU.

He's the perfect example of a reasonable person who gets called an "ist" or a "phobe" in bad faith by people who know they are lying, and a perfect example of why people so often view those accusations with scepticism now.

To start: he’s anti-intellectual, a misogynist and beloved of the alt-right. When someone explains away complex ideas and debates in a reassuring way that makes people feel safe, there are alarm bells going off for me.

& someone on this thread has already actually used Trump’s term ‘alternative facts’ in good faith.

When I saw the title of this thread I thought you were talking about the England goalkeeper but I think he is Jordan Pickford!!! (Backs away from thread in embarrassment).

YABU.

www.currentaffairs.org/2018/03/the-intellectual-we-deserve

longreads.com/2018/07/12/petersons-complaint/