I've been thinking about this thread today and wondering why I tend towards the "ghosts might exist" point of view.
Could be that I'm gullible.
But in another way, I'm quite sceptical. That is, I just struggle to believe that so many people are experiencing so many sensory blips.
I just always believe my senses, prosaic as that might sound. I've never even fainted, let alone experienced any of the stuff people keep describing on here. If I see a person, I see a person- I just wouldn't be prepared to believe it was a tree or a trick of the light or whatever!
However, I haven't seen a ghost.
I'm 38. My experience of life has been quite straightforward. I mean, I've had some bad depressive episodes, some mental health issues, but everything has made sense on a sensory level. I don't think I'm unusual in this.
In that time, I do believe I once heard a ghost. Yes. I do think that. Only once. It was different from everthing else I've experienced. I wasn't expecting it. There was nothing Victorian about it. And no, I couldn't swear on any level that it was a ghost. Neither could it stand up to the sort of scientific investigations that Betrand is so fond of.
However, I must admit that I do believe in my own experience. And I trust my senses.
I know, on balance, that it does seem weird to believe in a ghost over the possibility of a sensory blip. Yes, I can see that. But there we are.
I guess I'm also swayed by a desire to believe in the supernatural. But I also think it's quite logical to assume there are things we can't understand. I feel it as a human. I know this will attract scorn from certain posters. But I can't believe we're just chemicals. Seems implausible.