Here we go again with the usual mumsnet hypocrisy.... Why the outrage (because its misogyny, sexism etc), because it's a criticism of what a woman is wearing, when it's perfectly acceptable to admire, gush, drool etc about clothes that women in the public eye wear normally.
A perfect example is when Princess Diana was alive, every single thing she wore, every hair style, magazines devoted to her etc etc Who was caring what Charles wore?, where was the outrage about that....... Why was it such a big deal what she wore, but no indignance that Charles clothes weren't getting scrutinised. We all know the answer to that, no one cared, because one suit looks pretty much like another, but mainly because Diana enjoyed the reaction to what she was wearing, people were OBSESSING over her clothes. That is the world we live in now, it's all about image.
So if we're all going to drone on about how wonderful so and so looked and what a gorgeous outfit Meghan wore yesterday or how beautiful Kate looked etc, why the shock horror when someone says they hated a dress the PM wore. It works both ways ffs, fifty years ago no one would have cared or known what a PM wore, but we live in a different world now, and a woman PM is always going to get more attention for what she wears than a man does, and we're all guilty of that, stop pretending otherwise, it's tiresome.