maggie It's because hardly any feminists noticed, because transwomen didn't affect us at that time:
for many years we had a quiet, unspoken "gentlemanly" arrangement, that the then miniscule number of transwomen got on with their lives like the rest of us.
Those who wanted to enter women's loos or join women's demonstrations made the greatest possible effort not to look like men;
they didn't deliberately get in the face of women or try to take over the joint.
So why should most feminists have been concerned by a relatively harmless bunch and such a tiny number of them ?
We were sympathetic, if anything.
BUT - That all changed with this recent wave of TRA activism, which is space invaders on steroids:
The key factor is the characteristic male aggression being turned against all criticism from feminists
The beatings at demonstrations, the online threats of murder, torture and rape.
The attempted erasure of the biological definition of women.
Those weren't typical behaviours of the far fewer transwomen that there used to be.
But trans has become a lifestyle thing for a certain type of man who reacts violently to dissent from women - but rarely from other men.
Too many TRA activists now who have obvious contempt for women, who make no effort to "pass" and who aggressively assert the right to flaunt a naked penis in a previously safe women's space.
Too many who cheer on transwomen deliberately injuring women in contact sports.
In all sport now, the ridiculous spectacle of previously mediocre / middle-aged athletes who, because of their male biology, are able to beat the very best women.