If you look at this, I don't think giving the teachers guns would be either here nor there (although I'm vehemently opposed to it):
. It's mind-blowing isn't it!
I agree with a PP. I've not got a problem in general with 'the right to bear arms' but cannot understand why this seems to need to translate into 'you can buy guns really easily, as many as you like, stockpile 'em if you want, buy automatic and semi automatic weapons so you have the ability to kill hundreds of people at a time'. That's two entirely different things.
Trump suggesting we add to that, well, is absolutely dim-witted in the extreme.
Some interesting statistics here: www.statista.com/topics/1287/firearms-in-the-us/
And if you read the TED talk by the mom of one of the Columbine massacre shooters - not excusing what her son at all as neither is she but after the fact she realised he had very serious unrecognised until it was too late, unshared by him until it was too late, and thus untreated, severe mental health problems (caused initially by bullying - this is a consistent trigger for severe mental health decline in young people). This means that there are a lot of people walking round out there who are a danger to themselves and to others. That boy didn't even want to kill others (not really), he just wanted his own life to end and his thinking was completely disordered by this point in time when he committed these acts.
It's an awful, awful mess. Surely the right to enjoy one's life without fear of being shot to bits trumps (no pun intended) the right to own a gun / guns?
It's actually on a par with saying "Oh jeez, there's a hole in our boat, let's make the hole bigger to stop the leak" - isn't it, it's literally that stupid a solution.