I dont know how you cannot compare FGM with circumcision both are the mutilation of a child's gentiles.
talking about specfics of what would happen to a boy if the exact degree of babartity took place on him, doesnt take into account the hundreds of issues and complications hundreds, thousands and world wide millions of boys will face at the direct result of their parents choosing this mustilatin for them.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/apr/20/male-infant-circumcision-judge-practice
No formal attempts have been made to quantify the extent of medical complaints arising from circumcisions. We know that hundreds of babies and children are admitted to British hospitals every year with infections, uncontrolled bleeding or other complications. Shockingly, despite horrific evidence of serious injuries and even deaths arising from botched circumcisions conducted by unqualified practitioners in non-clinical conditions, there remains no legal regulation of circumcision in this country. Anyone can set up shop as a circumcision practitioner in Britain today
Its time we did know what is going on and had some concrete figures back.
We need to go further, however, in challenging and exploding prevailing myths about circumcision, such as the idea that it is painless for babies, that it is no more invasive than an ear-piercing, or that it has proven health and hygiene benefits. All these ideas have now been resoundingly and repeatedly disproven by medical science