It's looking possible that DH and I are nearing the end of our marriage. Nobody has mentioned divorce yet but I'm a forward planner and have been thinking about the logistics.
Basically we own the house jointly and in the eyes of the law, own 50/50 each. Morally however I know that DH put around £20k more into it when we first moved in. I'm not a scammer so would not try and take that from him. So in the event of divorce, the house would, I'm assuming be sold and he would get his £20k back and the rest would be split equally. I couldn't get a mortgage on this house as a single person and couldn't afford to buy him out. So either way, I'd have to leave eventually.
However, I work on a casual hours contract so in order to get a mortgage for any house, I'd need to get a full time, permanent position which thankfully won't be a problem in my line of work.
Would it be an unreasonable request to suggest to DH that I stay here for a year to two years - paying the full mortgage and all associated costs/bills and he move out? This would give me the time to get a permanent job, be in said job for required amount of time and also save for a deposit for another house? He would stop all financial contributions from the date he moves out and when it comes to selling, he'd have two years worth of mortgage payments (from me) added to the overall investment? Then we sell, he gets the £20k back and the rest is split (including the two years payments from me).
Also, that way my youngest son will be an adult and no longer reliant on me to house him.
Is it reasonable?