Lyra I'm afraid you've completely misinterpreted Monroe when they say that women attending the women's march ought not to centre on our reproductive biology.
They aren't saying, 'hey everyone, we need to focus on lots of issues affecting women (like girls' education, the pay gap, etc. etc. etc.) and not just their genitals/issues affecting them like abortion. (I see you use the example of Malala and women receiving an education as being an issue away from reproductive rights)
In actual fact, Monroe is literally only saying, hey everyone, a woman isn't a woman because of their biology. She wants people to include, and actually CENTRE transwomen in this whole debate. She wants the march to be about transwoman's issues MORE than anything else, because to Monroe, intersectional feminism means examining who is the most oppressed. And a transwoman, POC scores way more points than a white woman on the oppression scale.
She is literally trying to take today's debate away from women when in fact everything affecting women is about their reproductive biology because the oppression of women is based on their biology. Every issue comes back to our sex.
Again coming back to Malala - I'm sorry but it couldn't be more inappropriate to even mention her name in all this. Monroe gives zero fucks about Malala or about girls' education. Again Monroe cares about transwomen. It would be completely different if Monroe cared about the things Malala was fighting for. If transwomen were genuinely joining in with campaigns about making things better for girls around the world, I'd budge up on the women's bench and say an honorary 'welcome. Thank you for adding your voice.' It would be an acknowledgement on transwomen's parts that girls are oppressed because of their biology, that they can't identify out of it and that feminism needs to focus on WOMEN.
You have huge faith in Monroe and I can't for the life of me understand why other than you having misread her twitter. She's being completely transparent in what she believes.