Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think this is an awful present *Apprentice spoiler* [edited by MNHQ]

110 replies

Idreamofalandrover · 18/12/2017 13:58

The apprentice winner is selling 825g of basic sweets for £18 +£5 standard delivery

www.sweetsinthecity.co.uk/collection/giant-jars-of-joy/gjoj-retro-classic/

Morrison's are selling almost double the amount of mostly the same sweets for £5 and you can get free delivery

groceries.morrisons.com/webshop/product/Swizzels-Super-Stars-Variety-Mix/351652011?from=search&tags=%7C105651&param=swizzels&parentContainer=SEARCHswizzels

And a multimillionaire invests 250k in this while people up and down the country are having public services cut to the bone. If you made your fortune wouldnt you want to invest in businesses that help the community

OP posts:
SleepingStandingUp · 20/12/2017 00:40

The real travesty was that these two made it to the final!!!! Should have been Michaela and Elizabeth.

They're just so bland. The finalists and the sweets

SleepingStandingUp · 20/12/2017 00:50

The spacing on this label because of the two fonts makes me twitch

To think this is an awful present *Apprentice spoiler* [edited by MNHQ]
WhatToDoAboutThis2017 · 20/12/2017 01:48

Should have been Michaela and Elizabeth.

Definitely not. They're funny and interesting to watch, sure, but I can't imagine anyone actually working with them and keeping their sanity.

Michaela is too loud and forward, while Elizabeth is too bossy and railroads over everyone's ideas.

Idreamofalandrover · 20/12/2017 07:36

Just don't be a dick, OP. Take some responsibility

Oh feck off, it's a trashy reality TV show and it wasn't a spoiler it was the next day and had a total of 4 mins without apprentice in the title. Some people are dicks though Biscuit

OP posts:
SleepingStandingUp · 20/12/2017 09:03

WhatToDoAboutThis2017 I think Michaela would have made a far better winner

TathitiPete · 20/12/2017 09:59

So the business is called 'Sweets in the City' now instead of 'Sweeteze'? Neither of those names are great but not as bad as the original 'Sarah's Chic Sweets'.

cathf · 20/12/2017 10:05

I think her business was called Sweets in The City but she changed it to Sweeteze at the final.
I think Michaela was the more credible candidate, but it looks like she has a few skeletons in the closet with her business portfolio, so I don't think AS could have invested in her anyway.
I wonder if any due diligence is carried out before the programme starts?

ConcreteUnderpants · 20/12/2017 14:50

How come she is allowed to use that ridiculously ripped off logo?
I can only guess the HBO lawyers don't think she'll be enough of a success to bother with suing.

Idreamofalandrover · 20/12/2017 14:52

Hbo should send her a C&d now, I wonder if they still care about the brand

OP posts:
UnicornRainbowColours · 20/12/2017 15:00

Oh no I figured it was on Wednesday as usual!! Oh well I thought both were crap. I love how bland Sarah thought the bow made hers unique haha 😆

New posts on this thread. Refresh page