This is interesting. I have been married for 17 years. I am now seperated. I have never felt the fwb was tacky or being used. I have never thought it would have been for me as i get too emotionally involved. I didnt have ons before marriage either.
Now i am seperated i still dont think its for me. A good friend has offered me a fwb set up. He is attractive and makes me laugh. I like spending time with him. However he hss some traits I am determind to avoid in any future ltr. I am so nervous about having sex with someone new, fwb with someone i get on with and trust feels like a good way to get over that fear.
On the other hand i still think i will get too emotionally involved, overlook the traits i wanted to avoid and end up in a relationship with someone who isnt right for me.
So i wont be pursuing it and have told him that. We are still friends and he is ok with it.
Tbh it sounds like ops relationship would be classef as fwb by lots of people (me included) but some people wouldnt interpret it that way. I think the Ops issue just comes down to perception. What she calls a relationship, some people call fwb.
So whats the issue? I cant help wonder if the op objects to the phrase 'fwb' because she knows thats what some people would class ger relationship as, but it meant more to her.
People should be able to do what they want and classify their connection to someone else, in anyway they want. If some people want to call it 'fwb' thats fine. If someone people want to call it a 'casual relationship', thats fine too.
The main thing is that both people involved are on the same page. Yes fwb can go wrong. So do marriages, realtionships, friendships, etc.