@lilybookins
Genuine question - why do you want six children? Do you have a mix of sexes or is it to have another try for a boy/girl? I know a few 'big' families - 4/5/6 and in one case seven and it has always smacked of 'showing off' a kind of 'look at us, aren't we fertile, we're just a mad, crazy family?'
I just don't get the need or want for six kids but maybe I'm missing something. I can tell you though that for the people out there who haven't been able to have a desperately wanted first (or second) child these sorts of families are rather annoying and in your face - I really wouldn't post anything, just privately email or text your far flung family members. But then I'm a person who wouldn't dream of posting an 'I'm pregnant' on social media and then bore everyone with 'bump watch' for months to come. Yuk.
Agree a bit with this.
DH has a cousin who has 3 kids, (aged 3, 5, and 9,) and she breastfed them all. She still breastfeeds her youngest 2. Now that in itself is a bit weird (IMO,) but what really fucks me right off is how she bangs on about it.
She posts pics of FB of her kids EVERY DAY, and at least 3 or 4 times a month, she posts pics of her breastfeeding her 3 year old and 5 year old simultaneously. With the about 10 hashtags! 
#babies #babymamma #feedingtime #mychildrenmylife #milkycuddles #notforeveryone #natural #bestmamma #bestbabies
VOM VOM VOM! 
As for the having 6 kids... Doesn't bother me tbh. Even though it's a larger than average family, most people don't have that many, so I can't see the issue. Unless, of course, the family in question are reliant on benefits.
As someone said earlier, I don't know any family with more than 3 kids who claim no benefits; all big families seem to. And I do wonder if there was no such thing as state handouts, if people would have so many kids. In this day and age, the well educated, high earners, and middle classes, don't tend to have more than 2 children. 3 max. (and 3 is quite rare.)
I know about 10 people (over 35,) with 4 or more siblings, and all but 2 of them hated having a big family, as they felt like they were always competing for the parents attention, and they hardly had anything, and hardly went anywhere, and don't ever remember doing stuff with their parents (Like day trips, picnics, pop concerts etc...)
Many of them don't get on with all their siblings either, and in some cases, the oldest (female) child, becomes a second mommy because the mother of the 5, 6, or 7 children (or more,) cannot cope with all the drudgery and hard work that goes with having all those kids.
I know one woman (40 now,) who couldn't wait to leave home, because she had 4 younger brothers - 3, 5, 6, and 9 years younger than her. She had to wait on them hand and foot, til she left home at the age of 20, purely because she was the 'girl,' and it was expected for her to help her mother, and helping her mother included looking after the brothers.. And yeah, I have known this scenario often.
I know many 'only' children, and children with just one sibling who had a much better childhood than the ones with 3 or 4 (or more) siblings. They have better relationships with their parents, and they are more successful academically, and in their career.
Having more than 2 kids would not be for me. 2 is enough for anyone IMO, but as I said, it doesn't bother me when people have 4+. As the poster I have quoted said though, I don't 'get' why. There is really no need for it. I don't look down on people with lots of kids, I just don't 'get' it.
PMSL at the pearl clutchers who so enraged at the phrase 'butt-hurt!' It's a common phrase in younger people. (Under 40.) Get over yourselves!