Charlie Gard 9

[muckypup73]

Hi guys new thread.

Let's try to keep this one as sensible and measured as the past 7 threads have been.

Please note the MNHQ comment on thread number 7.

"Hi everyone,

..... We had to remove several parent-blaming posts, so we'd like to ask folk not to do this. We think we can all agree that this is a truly awful time for all involved and we just wouldn't wish it on anyone. If there's anything we could do with more of, it's support. We'll continue to remove reported posts that break TGs (if we've missed something, do feel free to let us know).

If we have to make too many deletions, we will need to look at removing the thread; which is the last thing we wish to do.

Thanks all"

Jim from Sky is not too bad although he peppers his tweets with personal opinion. By far the worst of the three is Catherine Glenn Foster with her propaganda

Just seen CGF's latest tweet:

Breaking: Expect a story that's been percolating on the internet for a few days to go big within the next 24 hours! 😳 #CharlieGard

I've just been looking at CGF's Twitter. Ugh.
I like Sky Jim because he told us about Justice Francis' pronunciation of GOSH.

However, I do like Rozenberg's reporting best.

That's a hard read Cavemum.
He's absolutely right though.

Of course people can read what they want but if they do not refer back to what was actually said in court then speculation and inaccuracy sound like facts when they are not. I have read many threads on this and although there are excellent comments with great insight there are some factual inaccuracies that are taken from other sites that need to be challenged. That was my reason for suggesting contributors read what is actually said rather than thinking gossip is accurate. Clearly not everyone was getting facts from the court!

Who is this tweet from? What is breaking news then? Explain spiteful we are all ears. Mr Gard must be very careful what he tweets. After all there is a court case going on.

That tweet could mean anything. It could even be related to Obama care after all poor Charlie's name is dragged into all sorts. Or perhaps she's heard they are announcing the next doctor after Wimbledon tomorrow and got her wires crossed.

Smiling mind can you send a copy of your email and CitizenGo's reply to [email protected]? When I rang the (very nice) lady said she hadn't heard of any other cases, so if other people contact them they will realise that it isn't just me.

Well the docs meeting is happening tomorrow and it said about the next 24 hrs, could it be about that perhaps?

I saw the ridiculous comments on CA about morphine making him 'sleepy'. The stupidity is breathtaking.

Oh sorry think I read your post wrong spiteful

I thought the Drs were meeting on Monday when the US Dr is here. I could be wrong though!

No worries Sos, I do that all the time

Don't quote me on this as I am a bit out of it today but thought I read that the US doctor had decided the treatment may work better if he added an extra nucleoside to it.

There is another fb page that I believe is run by the family, more balanced feedback seems to be allowed there without it being censored. By balanced read opposition.

Just read the tweet about GOSH not allowing the pastor onto the PICU to pray for Charlie at his bedside. Can kind of understand how that might not be appropriate and difficult for the other families, if they are in the same room. He says he has never had a problem with praying at a bedside of a patient before

Which is that Maudlin? The Charlie's Fight FB page?

CA think GOSH are doping him up with morphine.

I thought the doctors meeting was on Monday. Could it be something to do with head measurements being taken as it was said it should be done over the weekend I think (although may have misremembered)

Someone may have posted it above but below if you click on the link in the tweet is GOSH's position paper and it is very good indeed.
twitter.com/JoshuaRozenberg/status/885762808217993216

It is just 6 pages long but summarises the position of GOSH very well.

Yes I believe that is what it's called bath.
It must be so difficult for the family to read those posts and I can understand why the other page only allows supportive comments, but I fear that is the very reason they cannot accept the position GOSH have taken.

Happy to Light what would be the best way to send it ?

Just to be really awkward, but surprised no one has pointed this out. 1 in 9 is not 10% - we're being submitted to that bad maths again!!

They are being their usual delightful selves over on CA.

Poster 1 - No, not even Trump can do it, it would destroy US-UK relationship

Poster 2 - Well your a prick

Not it but them