MargaretTwatyer, again you pop up, then fuck off, are you partof charlies army?
No. I'm not. I have no idea who is right or wrong in this case and my only opinion on it is that I don't have either the inside knowledge of the situation or the medical expertise to have any kind of opinion on what should happen to Charlie.
I've had a load of abuse and the sum total of what I've said on all the threads is that hospitals shouldn't be immune from criticism or scrutiny and that the way posters on this thread are talking about a family going through a traumatic time is wrong. Which is pretty fucking mild.
Having concern for Charlie doesn't justify the awful speculation that has taken place on this thread. It's not been measured and balanced, it's just as much of a mob as CA.
Obviously some people on this thread can't deal with a mirror being held up to their own behaviour whilst they sit and pick apart the behaviour of this family.
I have popped up and come back as someone said, but that's because I find looking at some of the awful things being said about this family really hard to deal with.
They're going to have another baby and dump Charlie when he's not a cute baby.
The mother must have some sort of secret or sinister background which will come out (based on a 'feeling').
They are loving and enjoying the publicity and that is all they care about.
The mother wants to be famous so she can release a single.
And plenty more besides. I might look back and actually do a little compilation of the 'measures and balanced' personal comments ripping this poor family apart.
Somebody could absolutely and passionately argue for their belief that Charlie should be allowed to die without stooping to personal cruel remarks about the family which are based on nothing more than idle speculation. It's unnecessary and it's just plain nasty.
Ironic some of you are complaining about CA deleting disagreement when you don't seem to be able to handle it yourselves.